The ice bucket challenge isn't a waste of water, and this chart proves it

There are some good reasons to be critical of the ice bucket challenge, which has seen over a million people dump a bucket of water on their head to promote awareness and funding for ALS research.

Arguing that it's a waste of water, however, isn't one of them.

I've seen a few different people criticize the trend for wasting perfectly good, clean water. That may be true, but when you look at the amount of water wasted in the context of the staggeringly huge amounts of water we use to produce food — especially animal products — the ice bucket challenge is truly a drop in the bucket (sorry).

These numbers are based off an excellent chart on water use made by Eric Holthaus at Slate, and the assumption that the average bucket of ice and water contains five gallons. But even if the bucket contained 50, it'd still waste less water than is used to produce a single egg — and about a thirtieth as much as is used to produce a pound of beef.

The reason that animal products require so much water is that you have to take into account all the water used to grow the crops to feed the animals. For an average cow raised in an American feedlot, it takes somewhere between 5.3 and 7 pounds of corn to produce a single pound of beef.

Even if every American did the ice bucket challenge, we wouldn't drain our groundwater supplies. It's our agricultural methods and eating habits (and, perhaps, global warming) that are already causing our wells to run dry.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via