Welcome to the girls' science workshop about makeup

If you're in favor of getting more girls interested in science, we have some bad news:

Source: Wonkette

These are workshops offered at Pittsburgh's Carnegie Science Center, and they've started to cause an uproar on Carnegie's Facebook page and news sites like Jezebel.

And it's easy to see why: there's an imbalance in the quantity of programs for girl v. boy scouts, but also a distinct difference in the types of workshops offered. The boy scouts' programs have simple titles with no explanation: chemistry, engineering, robotics. But this is how the Center's website describes the girls' "Science with a Sparkle" program:

Prepare to be dazzled! Dive into chemistry and learn how science relates to health and beauty products. Become a cosmetic chemist and concoct your own creations to take home.

Sweet merciful crap.

Now, to be fair to Carnegie, this photo is of one-quarter of one page in a Carnegie pamphlet. The rest of that page, as Facebooker AJ Tarnas pointed out on Carnegie's wall, lists career-exploration science events aimed specifically at girls.

Furthermore, Carnegie has responded on its Facebook page with a thoughtful take on the need to provide science education to girls. And really, their answer shed far more light on the gender STEM gap than their workshop offerings themselves did: The problem, they said, is that the girls aren't interested.

Regarding Girl Scout-specific programming, we have struggled when it comes to enrollments for our Girl Scout programs. In the past, we have offered engineering, chemistry, and robotics programming for Girl Scouts. ... Unfortunately, no troops signed up for these. The programs that consistently get enrollments are "Science with a Sparkle" and our Sleepovers at the museum.

So if girls only seem to want glitter and lip gloss, then it's hard to get them excited about test tubes and astronomy just by offering those programs.

So it's not-great news all around. Yes, it looks awfully bad for a science center to offer sparkle-centric science programs for girls. But clearly something is teaching those girls to vastly prefer lip gloss to robots.

(h/t Wonkette)

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple reasons that we can't rely only on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on.

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. We can’t do that if we have a paywall.

That’s why we also turn to you, our readers, to help us keep Vox free. If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via