Skip to main content

Fearless journalism needs your support now more than ever

Our mission could not be more clear and more necessary: We have a duty to explain what just happened, and why, and what it means for you. We need clear-eyed journalism that helps you understand what really matters. Reporting that brings clarity in increasingly chaotic times. Reporting that is driven by truth, not by what people in power want you to believe.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Support Vox

New Federal Reserve data shows how the rich have gotten richer

It’s been a great 30 years for people who own businesses.

The top 1 percent of the US wealth distribution has increased its net worth by 650 percent since 1989, while the bottom 50 percent saw its wealth grow by a much more modest 170 percent during the same period.

That’s the message of a new data series from the Federal Reserve called Distributional Financial Accounts that attempts to provide more granular information about who owns what than we’ve previously had.

Federal Reserve

The story that the rich have gotten richer and inequality has grown is not new. But the Fed data does let us peek under the hood to help understand why inequality has grown so much.

Start with this chart which shows what portfolios looked like on different rungs of the economic ladder back in 1989. You’ll see that the bottom half of the income distribution had a huge share of its wealth tied up in real estate while owning essentially no shares of corporate stock. The top 1 percent, by contrast, wasn’t just rich — it was specifically rich in terms of owning companies, both stock in publicly traded ones (“corporate equities”) and shares of closely held ones (“private businesses”).

Federal Reserve

The past 30 years ended up being a very good time to own businesses. The S&P 500 is up about tenfold even before you account for dividends, for example. So the value of those specific assets — assets that people in the bottom half of the distribution never had a chance to own in the first place — soared.

President Donald Trump passed a major tax bill in the previous session of Congress that was overwhelmingly targeted at reducing the tax burden on people who own businesses. The theory behind it is that by making it more lucrative to own businesses, you will spur more business investment, which ultimately creates jobs and raises wages. But as you can see in these charts, we’ve already been doing that for the past generation — and overall growth has been generally slow, with wages rising just a tiny bit faster than inflation.

See More:

More in Politics

Why Elon Musk can never balance the budget, in one chartWhy Elon Musk can never balance the budget, in one chart
Policy

Elon Musk wants to slash trillions in “waste.” Good luck, buddy!

By Dylan Matthews
The unexpected place that could become an immigration flashpoint under TrumpThe unexpected place that could become an immigration flashpoint under Trump
Trump 2.0, explained

Trump’s immigration crackdown could extend to the US-Canada border.

By Nicole Narea
Biden wants to free you from all those subscriptions you meant to cancel but didn’tBiden wants to free you from all those subscriptions you meant to cancel but didn’t
Policy

It’s the latest way Biden is trying to combat pesky “junk fees” driving up prices.

By Nicole Narea
The not-so-subtle message of Trump's disturbing Cabinet picksThe not-so-subtle message of Trump's disturbing Cabinet picks
Culture

An alarming number of those poised to be in the president-elect’s inner circle are accused of sexual misconduct.

By Constance Grady
International arrest warrants are out for Netanyahu and Gallant. What happens next?International arrest warrants are out for Netanyahu and Gallant. What happens next?
Israel

The International Criminal Court issued warrants over allegations of war crimes in Gaza.

By Ellen Ioanes
The myth that could cost Democrats the next electionThe myth that could cost Democrats the next election
PoliticsMember Exclusive

Progressives staying home (almost certainly) didn’t cost Kamala Harris the election.

By Eric Levitz