President Donald Trump’s decision to declare a national emergency at the southern border to divert defense spending to build his border wall has split the conservative base.
Among the critics are one-time die-hard Trump supporters who think he’s accepting a raw deal on border security. The congressional spending deal puts $1.3 billion toward Trump’s border wall, limits the kinds of structures that could be built, and aims to reduce the number of detention beds available to Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
They see Trump’s national emergency declaration as a political cover-up for a failure to negotiate with a divided Congress. Take Fox News personalities Ann Coulter and Laura Ingraham, who urged Trump to not sign the spending bill:
No, the goal of a national emergency is for Trump to scam the stupidest people in his base for 2 more years. https://t.co/6DQSkqxV8h
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) February 15, 2019
So the president has his hand forced to sign a 1,159 page bill that we KNOW is filled with amnesty, PORK and wiggle room? Total SCAM! @realDonaldTrump wasn’t elected for this.
— Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) February 14, 2019
Others unhappy with Trump’s decision, however, include a contingent of conservatives — some who have long spoken against him — who think the Republican president is doing exactly what they railed against as an unprecedented abuse of executive power under President Barack Obama.
Rick Wilson, a conservative political strategist, captured this dynamic, warning his colleagues of the precedent Trump’s declaration could set.
1/ Every one of you "conservatives" gushing about the abuse of emergency powers owns it when a Democratic President declares a national emergency on Day 1.
— Rick Wilson (@TheRickWilson) February 14, 2019
Whether it's on guns or abortion or climate or LGBT issues, you just remember, you wanted this to be how things go.
Behind the scenes, Republican lawmakers have shared these concerns. Even Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who now supports Trump’s emergency declaration on the border, two weeks ago said Congress would work to avoid a national emergency declaration, reportedly privately advising Trump against it.
But these same lawmakers have largely pushed aside this nervousness to support their president. Most of Trump’s defenders on Capitol Hill, like conservatives in the House Freedom Caucus, have spent the last week saying “executive action” is the only way forward for Trump to get what he wants on immigration.
“Conservatives won’t be happy unless he takes other executive action,” Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) said of the compromise border security spending deal.
To best understand how much of a reversal this is for people like Meadows, read this 2014 statement from Meadows’s office after Obama announced an expansion for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program:
For six years President Obama has failed to lead on any meaningful immigration reform. Now, following a sweeping Republican victory on Election Day and just over a month before a new Republican Senate majority will take over, President Obama has announced a blatantly unconstitutional move to grant amnesty to at least 5 million illegal immigrants by executive order.
For years, President Obama has chastised Republicans, used immigrants as props for political purposes, and time and again deflected responsibility from his own party’s failure to act on immigration reform. Keep in mind that for the first two years of Obama’s presidency, Democrats controlled the House, Senate and White House -- yet he failed to pass immigration reform.
But that’s politics.