clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Rep. Steve King retweeted a neo-Nazi, and doesn’t seem sorry about it

What the Iowa representative shares with the European far right.

Zack Beauchamp is a senior correspondent at Vox, where he covers ideology and challenges to democracy, both at home and abroad. Before coming to Vox in 2014, he edited TP Ideas, a section of Think Progress devoted to the ideas shaping our political world.

On Monday, Iowa Rep. Steve King made headlines for perhaps the worst possible reason: He approvingly retweeted a British neo-Nazi, Mark Collett — a man who has, among other things, claimed the porn industry is a secret Jewish plot to destroy Christian families. It’s been more than a day now and King has neither deleted his tweet nor apologized for signal-boosting an anti-Semite:

This is nothing all that new from King, who once asserted on national television that no “subgroup of people” has contributed more to the world than white Europeans. Given his long history of spouting white supremacist rhetoric, it makes sense that he would be comfortable playing footsie with the likes of Collett.

But what’s particularly interesting here is the subject of their agreement, what Europe is allegedly “waking up” on: immigration. It’s the issue that brings together the Trump wing of the GOP, of which King is an extreme member, and the European far right, which at this point has become a powerful electoral force in countries as diverse as Hungary, Italy, and Austria.

The basic idea is that Europe and the United States are facing a “civilizational” threat, meaning mass immigration of people from non-European backgrounds. This, they believe, is the principal long-term threat to the survival of the “West” as a civilization — and hence needs to be curtailed. It isn’t always explicitly racist, but it comes pretty damn close.

Politicians across the Atlantic recognize their fellow travelers in this crusade. That’s how you get King praising Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán — perhaps the leading opponent of letting refugees into Europe, who literally built a fence separating Hungary from other European countries to block refugees from crossing the border:

European politicians have been acutely aware of the dangers of rhetoric about cultural and racial superiority for most of the post-World War II era, for the somewhat obvious reason that sounding like Hitler was electoral poison. But more recently, you’ve heard some politicians get more comfortable with rhetoric that breaks this taboo.

Just on Tuesday, for example, Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz called for a German-Italian-Austrian “axis” to fight “illegal migration.” You’d think the fact that those countries were members of the literal Axis during World War II would cause him to shy away from that particular word, but Kurz, a fairly clever politician, used it anyway.

What you’re seeing, with this rise of far-right anti-immigration politics across the West, is a destruction of gatekeeping norms: People’s hostility toward immigration is giving politicians license to mainstream more extreme voices and challenge longstanding anti-racist taboos. What’s worse is that a significant number of voters across the Atlantic seem to like it.