Trump is calling backsies on exiting the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal

President Donald Trump, who called the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal a “disaster” and pulled the United States out of the agreement in his first action as president, wants back in.

Trump has directed Larry Kudlow, his new top economic adviser, and US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer to look into negotiating the US’s reentry into the TPP, Sens. Pat Roberts (R-KS) and Ben Sasse (R-NE) told reporters.

It’s a truly shocking reversal from Trump on one of his signature campaign promises. Pulling the United States out of the TPP was not only his first executive order as president but also one of his few consistent policy positions. He’s called it a “disaster” and connected it to a “wave of globalization” that he says kills American manufacturing jobs.

The deal, as Vox’s Zeeshan Aleem explained, was one of the Obama administration’s major policy achievements and aimed to strengthened trade ties between 12 Pacific Rim countries — representing 40 percent of global GDP. But Trump relentlessly attacked the TPP and trade deals like it as job killers and a boon for other countries — a position that broke with his party but was successful among Rust Belt voters.

Republicans, however, have tried to convince Trump otherwise. In February, 25 Republican senators wrote Trump a letter calling on him to reverse his decision on the TPP and “re-engage.”

Trump has waffled on the TPP in recent months, and has said both that he would reconsider it if it was a “better” deal and that “there is no way to fix the TPP.” It’s not clear what a better deal would look like or how the US intends to renegotiate its way in. Only two months ago he said the TPP was “bad” for the US, reiterating his support for bilateral instead of multilateral deals.

Nevertheless, the move immediately received praise from congressional Republicans, who have had to suppress their longstanding support for free trade under Trump. Sasse lauded Trump’s direction as “the best thing the United States can do to push back against Chinese cheating” in a statement.

Republicans were apparently very persuasive.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple reasons that we can't rely only on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on.

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. We can’t do that if we have a paywall.

That’s why we also turn to you, our readers, to help us keep Vox free. If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via