Skip to main content

“The president’s going to continue to fight back”: White House defends Trump’s media attacks

Sarah Sanders defended Trump’s assertion that the media is the “enemy of the people” even as many have hoped he’ll tone down his language.

White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders delivers a press briefing in October 2018.
White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders delivers a press briefing in October 2018.
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders delivers a press briefing in October 2018.
Mark Wilson/Getty Images
Emily Stewart
Emily Stewart covered business and economics for Vox and wrote the newsletter The Big Squeeze, examining the ways ordinary people are being squeezed under capitalism. Before joining Vox, she worked for TheStreet.

After a week that included shootings at a Pittsburgh synagogue and a Kentucky grocery store and multiple pipe bombs being sent to President Trump’s critics, the White House is continuing to insist that any division in America is the media’s fault.

In a briefing with reporters on Monday, White House press secretary Sarah Sanders defended Trump’s continued heightened rhetoric. (Trump once again called the media the “enemy of the people” Monday morning.) She said he “wants to find ways to bring our country together” in moments of crisis but wasn’t stop his attacks on his opponents.

“The president’s going to continue to fight back,” Sanders said.

She denied he’s placing blame on the media, despite the fact that he has on multiple occasions. She was pressed on a tweet from former Homeland Security press secretary David Lapan, earlier in the day declaring that the press is “NOT the enemy of the American people.”

Sanders said that the president is not referencing “all media” as the enemy of the people, but rather is calling out “the growing amount of fake news that exists in the country.”

Jim Acosta, a journalist at CNN, asked Sanders which outlets the president considers the enemy of the people.

“I’m not going to walk through a list, but I think those individuals probably know who they are,” she said.

When Acosta asked her whether she and the president meant CNN, which has been sent three pipe bombs over the past week, including one on Monday, she said it’s “not necessarily specific to a generalization of a full outlet at times” but instead “individuals that the president would be referencing.”

Sanders appeared especially incensed by some suggestions that some of the rhetoric and divisiveness coming out of the White House might be tied to some of the violence over the past week.

The Pittsburgh shooting suspect’s social media posts indicate that he believed Jews were at fault for helping transport members of the migrant caravans from Central America that Trump has been stoking fears about for weeks. The mail bomber was a Trump supporter who was vocal about his contempt for the president’s opponents. Trump denounced anti-Semitism over the weekend, but in the past, such as in the wake of racist violence in Charlottesville, Virginia, last year, he offered a lukewarm response to calls for him to speak out against white nationalism.

“It’s irresponsible for news organizations like yours to blame responsibility of a pipe bomb that was not sent by the president, not just blame the president, but blame members of his administration for those heinous acts,” she said. “I think that is outrageous.”

Sanders was also asked about why Trump continues to attack figures such as California Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at his rallies, even though both were among those sent pipe bombs in the mail. As she did with the media, she tried to shift blame, in part, back onto them.

“Let’s not forget that these same Democrats have repeatedly attacked the president,” she said, name-checking remarks made by former Attorney General Eric Holder, who also was sent a bomb, as well as Clinton and Waters. “The president’s going to continue to fight back when these individuals not only attack him but attack members of his administration and supporters of his administration.”

More in Politics

A new Supreme Court case threatens to gut the Court’s one good trans rights decisionA new Supreme Court case threatens to gut the Court’s one good trans rights decision
Supreme Court

Republican Justice Neil Gorsuch surprised most Court watchers by supporting trans rights in Bostock v. Clayton County. We’re about to find out if he actually meant it.

By Ian Millhiser
How Kamala Harris could win (or lose) the Electoral CollegeHow Kamala Harris could win (or lose) the Electoral College
Politics

Joe Biden’s best path might not be Harris’s best path.

By Andrew Prokop
J.D. Vance didn’t have sex with a couch. But he’s still extremely weird.J.D. Vance didn’t have sex with a couch. But he’s still extremely weird.
Culture

The rumors were easy to believe, especially when the potential VP has such terrible ideas about sex.

By Rebecca Jennings
What Kamala Harris really thinks about Israel and GazaWhat Kamala Harris really thinks about Israel and Gaza
2024 Elections

Biden’s approach to the war in Gaza has been divisive. Would Harris chart a new path?

By Nicole Narea
J.D. Vance has made it impossible for Trump to run away from Project 2025J.D. Vance has made it impossible for Trump to run away from Project 2025
Politics

He wrote the foreword for a new book by Project 2025’s architect — and has backed some of its most extreme ideas.

By Andrew Prokop
So what does Joe Biden do now?So what does Joe Biden do now?
Politics

In an Oval Office speech, Biden said his farewells. But his job isn’t done yet.

By Nicole Narea