Trump isn’t delivering his own DACA policy because he’s cowardly and weak

Long before he was a politician, Donald Trump was a showman. So it’s telling that on the biggest political story of the week, the great impresario of nativist backlash politics has decided to make himself scarce. Instead of announcing his plan to kill the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program with a six-month delay personally, Trump is letting Jeff Sessions act as the star of the DACA episode of the Trump Show.

That’s no comfort to the 800,000 people — and the millions of family members, friends, and co-workers who depend on them — whose lives are about to be thrown into chaos. But it’s a great reflection of the fundamental cowardice with which Trump has faced this issue. Rather than own up to his own decision and defend it, Trump this morning tweeted an exhortation to Congress to step up and solve the problem for him in some unspecified way.

Trump has let himself get jammed-up by nativist politicians who are more ideologically serious than he is. But rather than owning that decision — and taking the hit with the broad public and the business community that would entail — he’s trying to punt, fudge, and avoid responsibility.

Trump’s key priority in the DACA debate hasn’t involved any sort of policy goal at all. Instead, he’s been making a dual effort to avoid an open breach with Sessions and his network of nativist politicians while also trying to avoid becoming the face of the turn against DACA.

The precipitating event for the breakdown in this strategy is a threatened lawsuit from the attorney general of Texas joined by several other hard-right AGs. They planned to sue, arguing that DACA represented an overstepping of federal authority over immigration. Since the Trump administration in the travel ban cases has already argued that executive discretion over immigration matters is unlimited, they can’t genuinely believe the Texas case is right on the merits.

But Sessions — who successfully stood up to a Trump bullying effort over Robert Mueller this summer — is an anti-immigration true believer and seems to have told Trump he wouldn’t fight the lawsuit.

Too weak to stand up to his own attorney general thanks to earlier blunders, and too politically insecure to stand up to far-right state attorneys general, Trump is now blundering into a policy that’s both cruel and unpopular. And rather than work out a policy solution to avoid that outcome, he’s working out a solution whose main point is to try to let him personally duck responsibility.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via