Donald Trump’s feud with Mitch McConnell, explained

Both publicly and privately, President Donald Trump is very unhappy with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

In public, Trump has focused his complaints on the Senate’s failure to pass his legislative agenda. Earlier this month, the president told reporters that he was “very disappointed in Mitch,” said that the Senate’s failure to pass a health bill by one vote was “a disgrace,” and intimated that if the health, tax, or infrastructure bills all failed, the majority leader should perhaps step down.

But according to a new report from the New York Times’ Alex Burns and Jonathan Martin, Trump has expressed another complaint in private. In a tense August 9 phone call, Trump “was even more animated about what he intimated was the Senate leader’s refusal to protect him from investigations of Russian interference in the 2016 election, according to Republicans briefed on the conversation,” they write.

However, it was McConnell who inadvertently kick-started this feud in early August. “Our new president has of course not been in this line of work before, and I think had excessive expectations about how quickly things happen in the democratic process,” McConnell said at a Kentucky event. And the Times piece claims that McConnell has privately expressed doubt about whether Trump can salvage his presidency.

Now, it’s not yet clear whether this recent sniping will devolve into full-on conflict between the president and his party’s leadership in one chamber of Congress. McConnell has, after all, perfected the art of studiously ignoring Trump’s tweets and controversial comments Trump could also realize that he has far more to lose than to gain from antagonizing McConnell and other Senate Republicans.

Still, Trump’s unhappiness here has a very real cause: As has happened with many prior presidents, his dreams of sweeping legislative wins and lockstep partisan support have run up against the cold reality of the United States Senate. And his choice about how to deal with this will have major implications for his administration’s future.

Why the Senate has been such a thorn in Trump’s side

Months ago, back before Donald Trump was sworn in as president, I argued that the US Senate would determine whether he’d succeed or fail, legislatively.

So far, it’s made him fail.

The Republican majority in the House of Representatives has passed conservative bill after conservative bill — from the repeal and replacement of Obamacare to the repeal of Dodd-Frank to a series of deregulatory and tort reform bills to immigration enforcement bills — only to see them go nowhere in the Senate.

The biggest reason for this is the infamous Senate filibuster, which effectively requires a 60-vote supermajority to get a new bill through the chamber. Since Republicans only have 52 seats, that means they need to win over eight Democrats — a tall order for anything controversial. As a result, McConnell hasn’t even bothered to take up most of those House-passed bills, since he knows they’re doomed to defeat and would only waste precious Senate floor time.

But it’s not only about the filibuster. For nominations and other procedures that require a simple majority, Republicans have to hold 50 of their 52 senators together, which is itself a difficult task. And senators’ six-year terms make them less responsive to short-term political or presidential pressure.

For the health bill in particular, Republicans couldn’t even get that majority needed for the special budget reconciliation process. McConnell’s final Hail Mary — a “skinny repeal” bill he begged his members to pass to keep the process alive — fell short because of three Republican defections. All of the more fleshed-out Republican health bills, however, were several more votes short even than that.

Overall, Trump has now spent more than seven months in office with no major legislative accomplishments to show for it, and the Senate is the main reason why. So for months, he’s called on the chamber to change its rules to eliminate the legislative filibuster, to no apparent avail.

And beyond that, there’s the Russia scandal, which even many Republican senators seem to take very seriously. The Senate Intelligence Committee has been conducting what’s widely viewed as the most substantive and credible congressional investigation on the matter. Other GOP senators, meanwhile, criticized Trump for firing FBI director James Comey and are warning that he shouldn’t fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

Trump and McConnell have worked together so far, and still face incentives to do so

Yet as with any same-party president and Senate majority leader, Trump and McConnell have powerful incentives to work together rather than fight with each other — which, for much of the year, they’ve managed to do.

Trump needs McConnell to get his nominees confirmed and to help him achieve legislative victories. McConnell wants Trump to keep representing Republican Party priorities in his choice of nominees and his agenda generally, and knows the president remains extremely popular among GOP base voters and in the conservative media.

Perhaps most importantly, the two men have linked electoral fortunes and both want the Republican Party to do well in the 2018 midterms — McConnell so he can keep his Senate majority, and Trump so his administration won’t be dogged by Democrat-led investigations.

So McConnell has been extremely hesitant to criticize Trump this year — he often seems to be pretending he lives in a world in which Trump has no scandals and no Twitter account. Meanwhile, Trump has appointed McConnell’s wife, Elaine Chao, as secretary of transportation and has generally been happy to defer to McConnell’s seemingly superior wisdom on legislative matters. Life is easier for both of them if they’re getting along.

And for now, despite these recent presidential tweets and statements, they still do appear to be mostly getting along. For instance, earlier this month Trump did McConnell a solid by endorsing Luther Strange, the candidate McConnell strongly prefers in the Republican special election primary for Alabama’s Senate seat. And on the same day the feud was spilling into public view, the White House appointed a former McConnell aide as chair of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

But President Trump has, of course, proven willing to pick unwise political fights in the past, and may well do so here too by escalating this conflict further. Indeed, Politico’s Josh Dawsey reports that Trump seems increasingly willing to throw congressional Republicans under the bus in an attempt to preserve his “outsider” reputation — something that could prove disastrous as Congress struggles to deal with thorny issues like raising the debt ceiling and funding the government, and as the GOP tries to motivate its base in the 2018 midterms.

Trump is stuck with McConnell for the foreseeable future

Now, longtime followers of Republican congressional dysfunction may be getting some déjà vu from all this, recalling how a small group of conservative critics in the House of Representatives forced Speaker John Boehner from office in 2015.

Yet something like that is far tougher to pull off in the Senate, because there’s a difference in how party leaders in each chamber are chosen.

The speaker of the House is elected by the full House of Representatives. Therefore, to win the position on the first ballot, a candidate generally needs overwhelming support from his or her own party (because the opposition party will vote against him or her). As a result, a small group of defectors from the speaker candidate’s own party could block him or her from winning a majority.

The Senate majority leader, by contrast, is chosen in a closed-door, partisan election. Only the majority party votes in it. That means that a handful of defectors can’t humiliate McConnell in a leadership election on the floor. Instead, more than half of his GOP senators would have to turn against him in private.

That’s very difficult to imagine. Any senators — who institutionally prize their independence and the separation of powers — would likely recoil from a presidential attempt to depose their leader. And for the most part, despite occasional gripes, Republican senators like and respect McConnell’s leadership, and view him as effectively representing their priorities. There are no rumblings of a potential challenge to him, and instead public declarations of support:

Beyond that, many Republican senators simply don’t like or respect Donald Trump very much. And given Trump’s own unpopularity, they could well calculate that the better long-term play is to stick with McConnell.

But Trump could do a lot of damage to McConnell’s image if he wants to

And yet if the majority leader does want to stay in the Senate a while longer, the president really could make that a lot more difficult.

McConnell has represented the deep red state of Kentucky for more than three decades. He’s essentially an institution there, and has often been thought to be politically bulletproof (he easily batted away challenges in both the primary and general elections in 2014).

But Donald Trump is also a very popular figure in Kentucky. And a sustained campaign of criticism from Trump is the type of thing that might be able to badly hurt McConnell’s popularity among his constituents.

If McConnell chooses to run for another term, he’ll be up in 2020 (when he’ll be 78 years old). Trump could, theoretically, back a primary challenger to him that year. That would be the equivalent of nuclear warfare in politics, and would surely provoke retaliation from McConnell (who, even if the challenge were successful, would still be in the Senate until the end of 2020).

But even if Trump doesn’t formally endorse a primary challenge, if he continues to criticize McConnell, he would hurt McConnell’s image among the GOP base and foment criticism of the leader in media outlets like Fox News and Breitbart — which could well spur a more plausible primary challenge anyway.

McConnell has a keen sense of where the political winds are blowing, and he would surely very much prefer to keep his relations with the president positive.

But it’s unclear whether there’s more McConnell actually can do to get anything passed. He will surely argue that he tried his best on health reform, and that he simply can’t convince his senators to get rid of the filibuster. And he’ll try to get Trump to accept that he can’t get everything he wants.

The question will be whether the president listens.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via