David Brooks: the reason for inequality is uneducated people can’t order fancy sandwiches

David Brooks was widely ridiculed on Twitter Tuesday for his latest New York Times column where he made reference to his “friend with only a high school degree” and described her discomfort with the words at a “gourmet sandwich shop.”

Recently I took a friend with only a high school degree to lunch. Insensitively, I led her into a gourmet sandwich shop. Suddenly I saw her face freeze up as she was confronted with sandwiches named “Padrino” and “Pomodoro” and ingredients like soppressata, capicollo and a striata baguette. I quickly asked her if she wanted to go somewhere else and she anxiously nodded yes and we ate Mexican.

The paragraph spawned all sorts of parodies online with many criticizing Brooks’s perceived elitism or even saying it was just rude.

The article “How We Are Ruining America,” attempted to highlight the importance of what Brooks describes as “informal social barriers” — like how to pronounce the above sandwiches and ingredients — which he argues “segregate” lower classes even more than formal barriers like housing costs and access to education.

To feel at home in opportunity-rich areas, you’ve got to understand the right barre techniques, sport the right baby carrier, have the right podcast, food truck, tea, wine and Pilates tastes, not to mention possess the right attitudes about David Foster Wallace, child-rearing, gender norms and intersectionality.

For Brooks, the reinvestment of upper-class and upper-middle-class families in their children is positive except that it comes at the cost of socially excluding lower classes from access to similar opportunities because they cannot easily integrate into a wealthier communities.

Whether that message is any comfort to his friend when she reads his column remains to be seen.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via