Skip to main content

Free speech needs fearless journalism

Free speech is endangered; unbiased and trustworthy news is elusive. In a time of noise, confusion, and spin, we’re committed to clarity, truth, and depth — even when it’s hard.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

History will not judge 2016’s ratio of email coverage to climate coverage kindly

Our grandchildren will not judge us kindly.

Today, President Donald Trump announced that America would be withdrawing from the Paris climate agreement. It is a decision with potentially catastrophic consequences for future generations. With America officially pulling out of the deal, other major polluters might decide there’s little reason to persist with the painful work of hitting their emissions targets, much less making those targets more ambitious.

The world is currently on track for catastrophic levels of global warming. Destroying one of our last best chances to set a different path might prove Trump’s most consequential, and disastrous, legacy.

If it does, historians living in the altered climate of 2050 will look back on the 2016 campaign in horror. As they read the coverage, they will find a polity that knew of the danger and importance of climate change, but preferred to talk about Hillary Clinton’s emails instead. Indeed, as Media Matters documents, there was less coverage of climate change in the 2016 election than in the 2014, 2012, or 2010 elections:

Meanwhile, networks’ flagship news shows devoted more coverage to Clinton’s emails than to every policy issue combined:

This is one of those moments when you realize maybe we aren’t the heroes of the story. We often look back on past generations and wonder about their cruelty, their blithe dismissal of actions that seems to us, now, to be obviously moral, obviously right.

But imagine how future generations will look back on us. We knew all we needed to know about how climate change would likely affect our descendants, and we decided to let it happen anyway. And what will our excuse be? We were distracted? Doing enough would’ve been inconvenient? We decided to elect a president who thought climate change was a Chinese hoax because he seemed ready to “shake things up”?

“But what about her emails?” is a funny joke on Twitter, but it’s not going to be so funny as future generations realize it’s literally what happened. Our grandchildren will not judge us kindly.

See More:

More in Politics

Politics
Hundreds of societies have been in crises like ours. An expert explains how they got out.Hundreds of societies have been in crises like ours. An expert explains how they got out.
Politics

An analysis of historical crises over the past 2,000 years offers lessons for avoiding the end times.

By Peter Turchin
Politics
How to translate No Kings energy to actual political powerHow to translate No Kings energy to actual political power
Politics

“You do not need to prioritize getting rid of Chuck Schumer.”

By Christian Paz
The Logoff
Trump’s East Wing demolition, briefly explainedTrump’s East Wing demolition, briefly explained
The Logoff

The president vandalizes the White House.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
The buzzy word that Democrats have pinned their hopes onThe buzzy word that Democrats have pinned their hopes on
Politics

Can “affordability” be more than just a campaign pitch?

By Rachel Cohen Booth
Podcasts
What Young Republicans say when they think no one’s listeningWhat Young Republicans say when they think no one’s listening
Podcast
Podcasts

The biggest lesson from the racist, sexist, and antisemitic group chats.

By Avishay Artsy and Noel King
The Logoff
Trump’s $230 million cash grab, briefly explainedTrump’s $230 million cash grab, briefly explained
The Logoff

How the president plans to pay himself $230 million in taxpayer money.

By Cameron Peters