Skip to main content

Believe that journalism can make a difference

If you believe in the work we do at Vox, please support us by becoming a member. Our mission has never been more urgent. But our work isn’t easy. It requires resources, dedication, and independence. And that’s where you come in.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Support Vox

GOP legislator says healthy people lead “good lives,” should get cheaper health insurance

Throughout the debate over repealing and replacing Obamacare, many Republicans have objected to provisions that would roll back protections for patients with preexisting conditions. Allowing insurance companies to charge those patients more for coverage — which the replacement bill would do — has emerged as a major sticking point for moderate Republicans and an impediment to getting the votes to pass the American Health Care Act.

Few Republicans have publicly defended the practice of charging patients with preexisting conditions more money — and perhaps none as prominently as Rep. Mo Brooks of Alabama, who on Monday gave an interview defending charging more for preexisting conditions, arguing that this allows insurers to reward “people who lead good lives.”

The Republican health care bill, which Brooks supports, would once again allow insurance companies to charge sick customers higher premiums than healthy customers. This insurance practice, known as “underwriting,” is banned under the Affordable Care Act.

Brooks argued in an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper that this should change. Here’s what he said about once again allowing insurers to charge people more when they have a preexisting condition:

It will allow insurance companies to require people who have higher health care costs to contribute more to the insurance pool that helps offset all these costs, thereby reducing the cost to those people who lead good lives. They’re healthy; they’ve done the things to keep their bodies healthy. And right now, those are the people who have done things the right way that are seeing their costs skyrocketing.

Of course, this framing of preexisting conditions is absurd. There are some expensive health care conditions that can be traced back to lifestyle. We know that smoking, for example, is the top risk factor for lung cancer.

But there are plenty more expensive health care conditions that aren’t the result of any choice at all. Before the Affordable Care Act, as the Kaiser Family Foundation has documented, insurers would charge higher premiums — or deny coverage — to people with diseases like multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, and arthritis.

A healthy person is at risk of becoming a sick person at any moment, and not just because they didn’t lead a “good life,” as Brooks suggests. This risk of sickness is the whole point of buying health insurance: to protect against high health care costs that could hit anyone at any time.

Jimmy Kimmel talked on his show yesterday about his newborn son, who within hours of birth needed heart surgery. That baby will have a preexisting condition for his entire life. Under the Republican plan, he could face higher insurance premiums for something that happened when he was three hours old.

Preexisting conditions are not, in most cases, the result of bad choices, like Brooks describes. They are not the result of living a bad life. They are the result of bad luck, plain and simple.

More in Politics

What it will really take to end the war in UkraineWhat it will really take to end the war in Ukraine
World Politics

Trump wants a ceasefire. The problem is that Russia thinks it’s winning.

By Joshua Keating
The first electric minivan will change the way you think about EVsThe first electric minivan will change the way you think about EVs
Technology

Trump wants to crack down on EVs, but the industry is stronger than ever.

By Adam Clark Estes
What’s actually in Congress’ harsh new immigration bill?What’s actually in Congress’ harsh new immigration bill?
Trump 2.0, explained

Some Senate Democrats are entertaining the Laken Riley Act.

By Nicole Narea
What’s in the Gaza ceasefire deal? And can it last?What’s in the Gaza ceasefire deal? And can it last?
Politics

The agreement that hopes to end the Israel-Hamas war, explained.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Supreme Court seems eager to curb First Amendment protections for pornThe Supreme Court seems eager to curb First Amendment protections for porn
Supreme Court

A major free speech argument about pornographic websites went disastrously for the porn industry.

By Ian Millhiser
How the Los Angeles fires highlight the challenge of disaster reliefHow the Los Angeles fires highlight the challenge of disaster relief
Future Perfect

How to help — and how not to — in the aftermath of a natural disaster.

By Kelsey Piper