Trump's immigration agenda is alive and well in Austin. So is the fear it's struck in immigrants' hearts.

It was a Thursday morning in Austin, and suddenly ICE was everywhere.

A hotline for deportation-fearing immigrants — which typically got a call or two a day — started fielding a call a minute, overwhelming the volunteers manning the phones.

The pleas were vivid: They just took away a member of my family. They just raided my neighbor’s house. They followed him and pulled him over at the side of the road.

I saw them in a strip mall parking lot. I saw them down the street. There’s a black SUV, and I think that’s them.

Nightmares were spreading among the city’s 100,000 unauthorized immigrants.

Only a few of them were real.

While much of President Donald Trump’s agenda has stalled, either in Congress or in the courts, his efforts to revamp immigration enforcement within the US — to deport more people more quickly than his predecessor Barack Obama or any other modern president — are moving forward. The fear of deportation is spreading faster still. In the beginning weeks and months of the Trump administration, whole immigrant communities have been smothered in panic. The simple act of going outside has turned unthinkably risky.

Partly these fears are the product of (deliberately or otherwise) aggressive tactics on the part of federal immigration agents. But partly they’re the product of the worst nightmares of immigrants’ minds, now unleashed by the administration; perhaps unsupported by reality but not, in their existential fear, wholly irrational either.

The most persistent specter, in many communities, has been the threat of law enforcement checkpoints: Immigrations and Customs Enforcement officers camped out at the side of the road at heavily trafficked intersections in Latino neighborhoods, forcing drivers who came through to stop and prove they were in the country legally — or be arrested, detained, possibly deported.

Reports of such checkpoints flooded the hotline run by the advocacy group Grassroots Leadership that February Thursday in Austin (part of a nationwide sweep that picked up 683 immigrants over a few days). They also popped up in dozens of copied-and-pasted Facebook posts and retweeted tweets. There was a checkpoint at the intersection of Lamar and Rundberg. No, there was one on Decker Lane. No, it was somewhere else.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Advocate Zenén Pérez, of the Texas Civil Rights Project, got into his car and drove around to the intersections where ICE was reportedly camped out.

He didn’t find any checkpoints. Or any evidence that they existed to begin with.

Similar checkpoints seem to be “spotted” almost every day now: in Queens; in Burbank, California; in Orlando; in Montgomery County, Maryland. None of them have ever been verified or legitimated.

ICE strongly denies that it is conducting roadside checks of random drivers (and blames advocates for spreading “false, dangerous and irresponsible” reports). But immigrants remain convinced those checks are real.

As a result, many immigrants have avoided public space entirely. In South Philadelphia, an annual Cinco de Mayo festival has been canceled for fear of ICE. In California, immigrants are pulling out of medical appointments en masse.

In Austin, the combination of old wounds and new rumors has pinned immigrants in their homes for weeks. “Anecdotally, I’m hearing that victims of domestic abuse are not pursuing claims,” Mayor Steve Adler told Vox in late March, echoing concerns voiced by law enforcement officials elsewhere. “But it goes beyond that. The social service organizations in town that are providing safety nets to communities are reporting a drop-off in the number of people that are coming for those services.”

Only now, several weeks later, is the community even beginning to show signs of recovery. And the slightest hint of a new raid could be enough to take it down again.

Austin was anxiously primed for an ICE crackdown even before the raids started

Austin — like many other immigrant communities around the US — was primed for panic well before February.

Immigrants’ fear started to escalate after Trump’s election in November. Education Austin, the union representing the city’s public school teachers, began training students and parents to prepare for ICE raids.

Trump’s January inauguration provoked a new wave of worry — and set off a local fight that, in turn, gave immigrants (and the advocates who serve them) even more reason to dread a crackdown from the state and federal governments.

The local sheriff, Sally Hernandez, announced the day of Trump’s inauguration that she was setting strict limits on ICE agents’ ability to pick up immigrants detained in local jails — moving the county, by some definitions, into the category of “sanctuary” jurisdictions.

Texas’s state government has already taken aim at Austin over its liberal immigration policy, stripping it of some public safety funds. The Trump administration had made it clear that it didn’t tolerate “sanctuary cities” either. It was easy to imagine that ICE might follow the state government in cracking down on the city.

Ultimately, it turns out, there might be something to that theory: A Texas judge testified in March that ICE officials told him, two weeks before the raids, that they’d be conducting an operation in Austin as “the result of the sheriff’s new policy.” (ICE officials have denied the judge’s claim, but some anonymous employees at the agency have confirmed to reporters that they are trying to target “sanctuary” jurisdictions.) But at the time, the sense of inevitable retaliation led advocates to start seeing the specter of a raid before any raid actually happened.

On February 2, immigration lawyers and advocates started raising alarms about heightened ICE presence and activity in Austin. The resulting “ICE Raid in Austin?” headlines fueled a weekend’s worth of rumors about checkpoints and raids.

“That turned out not to be true,” says Cristina Parker, immigration programs director for Grassroots Leadership. But “everyone was a little bit on alert” nonetheless.

The group’s hotline — originally intended for immigrants who had already been detained, and their families, to get access to resources and legal services — continued to get calls that Parker describes as, “‘Hey, I’m hearing these rumors, I’m worried, can you tell me information.’” Zenén Pérez and his colleagues were sent a lot of “hearsay — folks were saying that, you know, ‘There’s a police car here; that means that they’re doing an ICE checkpoint or ICE arrests.’”

Then on Thursday, people started calling the hotline with “their direct experience of knowing somebody who was taken,” Parker says.

“That was when we knew we were dealing with something real.”

In the swirl of panic

Austin had seen raids before. In 2005 and 2006, as President George W. Bush began to ramp up federal immigration enforcement, ICE agents swept through Austin neighborhoods; in January 2016, the Obama administration used raids to track down Central American families who hadn’t shown up for their asylum hearings.

In those cases, Pérez says, advocates were usually able to spread accurate information about what ICE was doing because they’d talked to government officials in advance: “I sat down with all sorts of officials at DHS [the Department of Homeland Security] and ICE whenever the raids were happening.”

This time, there was radio silence. Even after reports of immigrants getting arrested began to be confirmed, ICE said everything was “routine.” The Mexican consulate (which did appear to be in communication with federal officials) tried to fill the gap; Pérez called that consulate “the best partner that we have right now, in complete information.” But advocates didn’t know enough — or didn’t have the reach — to address the wave of questions, rumors, and fears that swamped the city over the next few days.

Advocates were concerned that community members were mistaking local police officers — or state law enforcement officials, who were (in a stroke of very bad timing) going around arresting people on old warrants for unpaid parking tickets as part of the annual “Great Texas Warrant Roundup” — for ICE agents. Or they worried that a picture taken of a single arrest was being shared hours, or days, later as evidence of a permanent checkpoint. Pérez and his colleagues urged community members to timestamp everything.

“It’s kind of like a cycle,” Pérez says. Every raid triggers a panic effect disproportionate to its impact; the fear triggered by the January 2016 raids was nothing compared with the current panic, but it still threw a shadow over some people who (if they’d known the facts) would have known they weren’t at risk of being caught up at all.

“As much as we try to tamp down some of the social media reports,” he adds, “it’s pretty ineffective.”

Arresting immigrants at home is invasive — but doing so in public causes panic

February’s ICE raids didn’t indiscriminately target unauthorized immigrants simply for being unauthorized. They targeted people with criminal records, or those who’d already been ordered deported from the US. Sometimes they arrested other immigrants, who happened to be near those targets, as “collateral.”

But in the fog of rumor, the distinction got lost. That’s largely because ICE’s arrests may have been targeted, but they were also extremely public and visible.

“We saw actual ICE arrests occurring in very public spaces in Austin, including one, like, two minutes away from my home,” in the predominantly immigrant Rundberg area, Pérez says. Parker confirmed several incidents of ICE agents “following [immigrants] from work or from home,” and then, when the opportunity arose, pulling them over “under the guise of a traffic stop.”

That, she thinks, is where the checkpoint rumors came from. “It was happening on the road, and so people just assigned the word ‘checkpoint’ to that.”

It was hardly a wild extrapolation. Austin is barely outside the zone, stretching 100 miles into the US from the southern border, where Customs and Border Protection agents can set up permanent checkpoints to apprehend unauthorized immigrants.

And while ICE agents can’t set up roadside checkpoints themselves solely for the purpose of checking drivers’ immigration status, according to Chris Rickerd of the American Civil Liberties Union, they have been known to “piggyback” on checkpoints for other purposes set up by local police. In a single morning in 2012, a checkpoint set up by the Jackson County, North Carolina, sheriff’s office — ostensibly to check if drivers were wearing their seat belts — allowed the ICE officers conveniently stationed at the checkpoint to arrest and detain 15 immigrants.

Austin’s immigrants don’t know everything ICE can and can’t do under the law. They only know what they can see. And what they saw in February, according to local businesswoman Velia Cervantes (who runs a flea market toy shop), were ICE agents in immigrants’ public spaces. “Where the trucks are, where the businesses are,” she says, ICE was there.

Some advocates believe this reflects a government strategy. “The intention of these raids is to strike fear,” Parker says. “Otherwise they would do it quietly.”

Immigration and Customs Enforcement

From an agent’s perspective, though, the raids may be trying to avoid sowing undue fear. Theresa Cardinal Brown, who worked in the Department of Homeland Security under George W. Bush and is now at the Bipartisan Policy Center, says the alternative to arresting someone in public is usually arresting them at home — which causes its own problems.

“When going into homes,” Brown points out, ICE agents “have been criticized heavily for arresting individuals in front of their children and causing trauma.”

The toxicity of public space

For several days after the raids, many immigrants were afraid to go out in public at all.

Parker said construction worksites that were “usually extremely busy, with a lot of people out there working, seem very dead lately.” At least one local restaurant had stopped opening for lunch because its workers wouldn’t show.

And according to anecdotes from teachers, at least (the city school district hasn’t released official attendance statistics), public school attendance was way down in the days after the raids.

“Today I was talking with one of the parents that I’ve known for a really long time,” Montserrat Garibay, vice president for certified employees of Education Austin, told me a week after the raids, “and she was sharing with me that two of her really good friends are very worried.” One parent, Garibay’s friend said, was so depressed and anxious that she had locked herself in her apartment.

“The kids and her, they’re just in the apartment, not going out anywhere. Because they’re kind of in a terrified state,” Garibay says.

Her friend tried to coax the mother to allow her children out: “She was trying to talk to the mom, saying, ‘Okay, at least send the children, I’ll take the children to school.’”

A community only beginning to heal

La Pulguita de North Lamar is the sort of indoor flea market that sells basically everything, from subwoofers to frilly First Communion dresses. On a rainy Saturday in March, most of the merchandise is going unsold.

The market isn’t empty. Young men hang out in the seating area near the taco stands; a young girl presses her nose against a display window in admiration of the blue quinceañera-style dress on the other side. But customers aren’t willing to talk to me. The empty avenues toward the front of the market testify to how many would-be customers were still unwilling to come out at all.

How many are no more willing to go shopping on a Saturday than they are to show up at a domestic violence shelter or seek public benefits? How many still believe that not just government institutions but public space itself is toxic to them? How many are still haunted by the fear of the phantom checkpoints?

“The people who buy are the people without papers,” explains Velia Cervantes, who sells toys in a market stall. She sits on a bench repairing the undercarriage of one battery-powered toy car, while several others run in a demolition derby in front of her; she gestures with her screwdriver to the stall across the way, selling massive speakers and sound systems. “People buy there on the installment plan, because they don’t ask for papers.”

But now, “they don’t want to spend money — they don’t want to go out.” I hear the same thing from a woman whose stall sells a mishmash of religious iconography and kitschy wine bottle holders: Asked why business has been slower after the raids, she tells me (as if knowing she’s stating an obvious truth), “Because people are afraid to go out.”

Dara Lind / Vox

The knickknack saleswoman says she’s made only one or two sales on the day so far — and of only a few dollars apiece. Cervantes gestures to an empty kiosk; vendors have to pay rent on their spaces every week, and vendors who didn’t have the cash reserves to weather a few weeks of low or no sales got wiped out.

Cervantes herself is all right so far — her toy stall tends to make its money in the months leading up to Christmas — but she’s worried about what will happen toward the end of this year. “Some people get all the family” and take them back to Mexico, she says; will there be enough customers left in Austin and interested in buying toys for their kids?

The woman in the knickknack stall (who declined to be named due to privacy concerns) sighs when asked why she came to work in an empty market in the weeks after the raids: “Someone has to be here to pay the rent,” she shrugs.

Is she afraid? “Of course I’m afraid! Even the people who are residents are afraid.”

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple reasons that we can't rely only on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on.

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. We can’t do that if we have a paywall.

That’s why we also turn to you, our readers, to help us keep Vox free. If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via