Skip to main content

Paul Ryan: “Obamacare is the law of the land”

An admission that Ryan probably wasn’t expecting just three months into a full Republican government.

It was an admission of defeat that House Speaker Paul Ryan probably didn’t expect to make just three months into a fully Republican government: “Obamacare is the law of the land. … We’re going to be living with Obamacare for the foreseeable future.”

Since the Affordable Care Act was passed in 2010, Republicans have been working to repeal President Barack Obama’s signature piece of legislation. The House in particular tried to repeal or otherwise cripple the law — to no avail — literally dozens of times.

Then Republicans captured the White House, on top of already controlling Congress. It was widely believed that this was finally their chance to repeal the health care law they despised so much.

Yet when the time came to pull the trigger, they couldn’t do it. Not even because of Democratic opposition, but because different factions in the Republican Party just weren’t satisfied with the bill that House leadership put forward. More conservative members felt the repeal-and-replace bill didn’t do enough to dismantle Obamacare, while the more moderate members worried that the bill would rip away health insurance from too many Americans. This fracture within the party proved too much, and the American Health Care Act (AHCA) never obtained enough votes to even warrant a vote.

Still, Ryan argued that for Obamacare, “the worst is yet to come” — an allusion to the claim that Obamacare’s marketplaces are collapsing, so the law will fall apart on its own in due time. The Congressional Budget Office, however, found that this isn’t the case: “In CBO and JCT’s assessment, however, the nongroup market would probably be stable in most areas under either current law or the [AHCA].” If that holds up, Obama’s health care law really will stick around.

Democrats were counting on something like this happening. They believed that once Americans gained health insurance, they would come to support the law, fearing that a repeal could take their health plans and those of millions of other people. This was the basis for then–House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s now-infamous comment “We have to pass the bill, so that you can find out what is in it — away from the fog of the controversy.” Essentially, once the law is less attached to modern political battles, people will come to support the gains in coverage it provides.

This is generally true for social programs. As Paul Pierson, a political scientist at UC Berkeley, told Dylan Matthews, “The basic argument is that with these social programs — I was starting by thinking about things like Social Security but I think it applies with variation across programs — it’s a lot harder to get the toothpaste back in the tube once it’s out. People who are receiving benefits, they’re going to react pretty strongly to that being taken away from them. A taxpayer is paying for a lot of stuff and cares a little bit about each thing, but the person who’s receiving the benefits is going to care enormously about that.”

Republicans learned that today. And the result is, as Ryan acknowledged, Obamacare remains the law of the land.

More in Politics

Future Perfect
The stunning reversal of humanity’s oldest biasThe stunning reversal of humanity’s oldest bias
Future Perfect

Everyone wants to be a girl dad now.

By Bryan Walsh
Today, Explained podcast
What happens to DOGE without Elon Musk?What happens to DOGE without Elon Musk?
Podcast
Today, Explained podcast

Musk had big dreams. DOGE ran into reality. Here’s what will and won’t stick from the initiative.

By Denise Guerra and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s military parade is a warningTrump’s military parade is a warning
Politics

Trump has caused a crisis in civil-military relations — one that could eventually threaten democracy’s foundations.

By Zack Beauchamp
Politics
A court ordered Trump’s team to free an activist. They refused.A court ordered Trump’s team to free an activist. They refused.
Politics

It’s a case with high takes for freedom of speech and the rule of law.

By patrick.reis
World Politics
The Israel-Iran war hinges on three big thingsThe Israel-Iran war hinges on three big things
World Politics

It’s impossible to know how this war will end. But here’s how to make sense of it.

By Zack Beauchamp
World Politics
Will the US get drawn into the Israel-Iran war?Will the US get drawn into the Israel-Iran war?
World Politics

Trump seems to be trying to associate himself with the attacks after the fact.

By Joshua Keating