Trump blasts “Diversity Visa Lottery Program” after NYC terror attack

President Donald Trump once used the 2015 attack in San Bernardino, California, to argue for a ban on Muslim entry to the US. Now, after an attack that killed eight people in Lower Manhattan Tuesday, he’s arguing that US immigration policy (and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer) is partially responsible.

Police say Sayfullo Saipov, the 29-year-old suspect, plowed a rented pickup truck into pedestrians and cyclists on a busy bike path Tuesday afternoon. Initially, Trump blamed the attack on “a very sick and deranged person,” offered his “condolences and prayers,” and tweeted vaguely about ordering “Homeland Security to step up our already Extreme Vetting Program.” (It wasn’t clear, exactly, what he actually meant — and the White House hasn’t followed up.)

But Wednesday morning — apparently inspired by Fox & Friends — the president went on the offensive, lambasting the “Diversity Visa Lottery Program,” which he described as a “Chuck Schumer beauty.” Trump claimed that the suspect, who came to the United States from Uzbekistan legally in 2010, entered the country through this particular program:

He continued:

Details about Saipov’s background are still trickling out, and Trump didn’t provide any additional information about how the suspect arrived in the United States. At the time it wasn’t clear if Trump was just repeating unconfirmed reports — a local ABC affiliate first reported Saipov entered through the visa program, but according to the Washington Post, that hasn’t been officially corroborated. But the Department of Homeland Security acknowledged later Wednesday that Saipov did enter the U.S. through the diversity visa program.

The “diversity visa lottery” was created to bring in Irish and Italian immigrants

The program Trump referred to, the “Diversity Visa Lottery Program” (officially called the Diversity Immigrant Visa, or DV, Program), awards visas to people from countries that tend to have historically low immigration rates to the United States.

The program is part of the Immigration and Nationality Act, signed in 1990 by Republican President George H.W. Bush after bipartisan support in Congress.

What about Schumer? The Washington Post explains that the diversity program did come out of a bill that the then-representative introduced in 1990, which eventually wrapped into the larger immigration act signed that year.

Anna O. Law, a political science professor at CUNY Brooklyn College who studies US immigration and constitutional law, noted on Twitter that the program originated through an effort by senators and representatives with large Irish and Italian constituencies. At the time, Law said, “‘old seed’ immigrant groups were being shut out by newer groups from Asia and Latin America”:

The program is limited to 50,000 visas each year. While Irish immigrants were prioritized early on, in recent years, the majority of its recipients arrive from Africa and Eastern Europe. According to the State Department, no particular country will get more than 7 percent of available diversity visas each year.

Schumer didn’t remain a supporter of the program forever. As Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake pointed out, the “Gang of Eight” immigration reform bill — which passed the Senate in 2013 but was doomed in the House — would have eliminated the program, and Schumer happened to be part of that Gang of Eight:

This isn’t the first time Trump has opposed the visa lottery, either. The RAISE Act — short for Reforming American Immigration for Strong Employment, a bill to lower legal immigration sponsored this summer by Sens. Tom Cotton (R-AR) and David Perdue (R-GA), and backed by Trump — would also eliminate it.

Update: This post has been updated to reflect the Department of Homeland Security’s confirmation that Saipov entered the U.S. through the diversity visa program.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple reasons that we can't rely only on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on.

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. We can’t do that if we have a paywall.

That’s why we also turn to you, our readers, to help us keep Vox free. If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via