It’s been months since Trump said he’d declare a national emergency over opioids. He still hasn’t.

Back in August, President Donald Trump said that the opioid epidemic is “a national emergency.” But more than two months later, Trump has yet to file the paperwork to formally declare the crisis an emergency, as his own opioid commission recommended, and potentially release some federal resources to address the issue.

When asked over the weekend, White House officials gave me the same answer they gave me just one week after Trump’s initial comments: The declaration is undergoing legal review. They added that policy advisers are currently working out details with the relevant agencies.

The White House also pointed to Trump’s comments on Friday: “We are studying national emergency right now. Believe it or not, doing national emergency, as you understand, is a very big statement. We will be doing that.”

After this article was originally published, Trump said at a Monday press conference that the order will come “next week.”

Meanwhile, the numbers in the opioid crisis keep getting worse. In 2016, more than 64,000 people died of drug overdoses in the US, according to provisional data released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) last week. That’s a jump from more than 52,000 in 2015. The spike was driven largely by a rise in deaths from the synthetic opioid fentanyl, which was linked to nearly 20,000 overdose deaths in 2016, up from less than 10,000 in 2015, and surpassed common opioid painkillers and heroin in overdose deaths for the first time last year.

The declaration of a national emergency would not be a cure-all to the epidemic; as experts explained to me, it would at best be a start. Depending on how it’s done, it could unlock limited federal resources to help scale up addiction treatment and, according to Trump’s opioid commission, let the federal government negotiate down the price on the opioid overdose antidote naloxone. (Much more on all the potential effects of a declaration in Vox’s explainer.)

But experts and advocates in the addiction field are hoping for something. The annual overdose death toll is already in the tens of thousands, and it has been going up for years. And according to a 2016 report from the surgeon general, only 10 percent of Americans with a drug use disorder get treatment for addiction — largely because treatment remains too expensive, short in supply, and otherwise inaccessible.

Yet the federal government hasn’t done much to alleviate this. Congress in 2016 passed its biggest measure yet responding to the crisis, adding $1 billion in funding for treatment over two years — far from the tens of billions a year that experts estimate is needed.

And since Trump took office, his administration has worked against some of the solutions to the crisis. Trump’s budget proposal would do little to nothing to boost prevention or access to addiction treatment. Congress, with Trump’s full support, has worked (unsuccessfully — for now) to repeal Obamacare and, as a result, reduce access to insurance that can pay for addiction treatment.

Trump’s opioid commission, meanwhile, is still meeting. It expects to finalize its recommendations on November 1 — more than three months after it released its preliminary report proposing, among other moves, a national emergency declaration.

For more on the opioid epidemic, read Vox’s explainer.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via