Skip to main content

This moment demands more than headlines

In a time of noise, confusion, and spin, we’re committed to clarity, truth, and depth — even when it’s hard. That kind of journalism isn’t easy.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Trump claims 1.5 million people came to his inauguration. Here’s what the evidence shows.

On Saturday, President Donald Trump excoriated the media for — in his view — massively understating the size of his inaugural crowds. “I turn on one of the networks, and they show an empty field,” Trump said at a speech Saturday afternoon at the CIA. “I’m like, wait a minute. I made a speech. I looked out, the field was, it looked like a million, million and a half people.”

The unnamed television network, he noted, estimated a turnout of 250,000 people — a figure he argued was way too low.

“Now, that’s not bad. But it’s a lie,” he said. “We had 250,000 people literally around in the little ball we constructed.” In other words, 250,000 people had been given tickets to the swearing-in ceremony, which is what the Joint Congressional Committee for Inaugural Ceremonies told CNN.

“The rest of the 20-block area, all the way back to the Washington monument was packed,” Trump claimed.

This is an exaggeration. Photos taken at 12:09 pm, just after Trump was sworn in, show the crowd thinning closer to the Washington Monument:

National Park Service EarthCam

Of course, this would have been hard for Trump to see from his vantage point at the front of the crowd:

Donald Trump Is Sworn In As 45th President Of The United States
Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

The National Park Service no longer provides official inauguration crowd estimates, and the mayor’s office and other agencies have not released an official estimate, as they did two days after President Obama’s inauguration in 2009. So we don’t yet know how many people were there yesterday.

What we can say is that the turnout was likely between the low estimate of 250,000 and Trump’s quite high estimate of 1.5 million.

The Washington-area transit authority, WMATA, reported that only 193,000 people rode Metro on Friday as of 11 am, significantly fewer than the past two inaugurations and slightly fewer than President George W. Bush’s inauguration in 2005:

We can also compare aerial photographs of the National Mall during Trump’s inauguration with previous ones, like Obama’s inauguration in 2009:

Javier Zarracina/Vox

It seems clear that Trump drew significantly fewer people than Obama did eight years ago, and Obama’s crowd has been estimated at around 1.8 million people. So Trump’s estimate of 1.5 million people seems unlikely. But we’ll have to wait for an official estimate to be sure.

See More:

More in Politics

Politics
The jobs numbers were bad — so Trump fired the messengerThe jobs numbers were bad — so Trump fired the messenger
Politics

The abrupt dismissal of the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, briefly explained.

By Andrew Prokop
Politics
Trump actually has a tariff strategy this time. It could still go terribly wrong.Trump actually has a tariff strategy this time. It could still go terribly wrong.
Politics

There’s a method to his trade war madness. But major economic and legal risks remain.

By Andrew Prokop
Supreme Court
Brett Kavanaugh says he doesn’t owe the public an explanationBrett Kavanaugh says he doesn’t owe the public an explanation
Supreme Court

The justice has one half of a really good idea.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
Was Gen Z’s Trump era just a phase?Was Gen Z’s Trump era just a phase?
Politics

The paradox of today’s Trump-voting youth.

By Christian Paz
Politics
5 reasons Democrats are in good shape5 reasons Democrats are in good shape
Politics

And two reasons they’re in deep trouble.

By Eric Levitz
Politics
The Columbia deal with Trump is a blueprint. All of higher ed should fear what comes next.The Columbia deal with Trump is a blueprint. All of higher ed should fear what comes next.
Politics

The Ivy League agreements with Trump are a danger to all of higher ed.

By Nicole Narea