Turns out Donald Trump actually did have microphone problems during the first debate

Since the first presidential debate came to an end, Donald Trump has been mocked for seeming to blame his poor performance on a bad microphone — even though TV viewers didn’t notice any audio problems whatsoever.

“They also gave me a defective mic. Did you notice that? My mic was defective within the room,” Trump complained in the spin room afterward. “I wonder, was that on purpose?”

He continued in that vein during a Fox News appearance the following day. “When I tested it, it was beautiful — like an hour before. I said, ‘What a great mic.’ … [But during the debate] it was much lower than hers. I don’t want to believe in conspiracy theories, of course, but it was much lower than hers and it was crackling, and she didn’t have that problem.”

Trump’s statements seemed ludicrous — but now it turns out the GOP nominee may have had a point. The commission on presidential debates announced Friday afternoon that “there were issues regarding Donald Trump’s audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall.”

For more detail, check out the commission’s full statement, which is reproduced below:

Commission on presidential debates

Oh, uh, never mind, I guess the commission has decided to be extremely vague and esoteric about this rather than giving a clear explanation of what happened.

Some reporters who were in the room, however, have provided more details:

So while TV viewers didn’t have any problem hearing Trump, it is at least sort of plausible that he could have been thrown off his game a bit by having trouble hearing himself in the room.

Still, if the account that Trump’s audio problems were only in the very beginning of the debate is accurate, it is worth noting that many pundits thought he actually did rather well in the debate’s first half hour (on stylistic grounds, though not necessarily substantive ones).

Of course, a faulty microphone can’t excuse Trump’s policy ignorance, misrepresentations of the truth, and constant interruptions. But it’s at least a little reassuring to know that Trump wasn’t making up these audio problems out of whole cloth.

Watch: How presidential debates are won and lost

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via