Skip to main content

Democrats scheduled debates on days when no one will watch

Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz with Hillary Clinton.
Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz with Hillary Clinton.
Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz with Hillary Clinton.
Mark Wilson/Getty Images

The Democratic National Committee, which organizes the party’s primary debates, has faced accusations of scheduling them on dates that will receive poor viewership in an attempt to protect frontrunner Hillary Clinton. DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz has denied these claims. There are other hints Clinton wanted less exposure, including reports that her campaign privately lobbied the DNC for fewer debates.

But when you just look at the debate schedule, it’s hard to deny its absurdity — especially when you take a look back at political debates of years past.

Saturday debates? Not common at all.

In lieu of the Democratic debate this Saturday, I analyzed every debate since the 2000 election cycle — that’s 100 debates. Only seven of them took place on Saturday. The most recent was on January 7, 2012, when seven Republican candidates took stage in New Hampshire. Every Saturday debate since 2000 was during primaries, and most of them took place in early January.

TV ratings are generally lower on Friday and Saturday nights, which probably explains why there has never been a general election debate on a Saturday night. There have been five debates on a Friday since the 2000 election cycle, the most recent being the September 26, 2008, debate between John McCain and Barack Obama. And despite it being Obama’s first debate in the general election, just 52.4 million people watched the debate, significantly less than the 63.2 million who watched the next debate on a Tuesday.

Thursday is prime time for debates. Democrats have just one debate on Thursday.

It’s much easier to find viewership data on general election debates, so I looked at viewership data for every election cycle since 1984, via the Commission on Presidential Debates who collected it from Nielsen.

The verdict: Friday debates do poorly. The average viewership is just 49.6 million — the lowest of any day.

On the flip side, Thursday is king when it comes to debates. Of the 100 debates since the 2000 election cycle, 27 of them have been on a Thursday. The three general election debates on Thursdays garnered an average of 66.5 million viewers per event — by far the biggest number.

Thursdays are also the most popular day for vice presidential debates, with four of the eight VP debates since 1984 being set on a Thursday. And on average, those debates do quite well, with an average of 51.55 million people tuning in for the Thursday debates, which is only slightly lower than the average viewership for presidential debates (54 million).

Republicans have scheduled most of their debates on days that historically fare quite well. Democrats have not, with just one Thursday debate. It’s not rocket science, since there’s plenty of data from Nielsen and other companies that help predict when people will be in front of their TV sets. But that also means it’s not rocket science to schedule debates on incredibly inconvenient dates.

The DNC planned debates for times when people don’t want to watch debates

As pointed out by other publications, the Democrats didn’t only plan a debate on Saturday. They also planned a debate six days before Christmas — which, by the way, is also a Saturday. And another one is planned for the Sunday night of Martin Luther King Day weekend, although Democrats are hoping to retain some of the audience from the NFL playoff double-header before the debates. So arguably half of the six debates are on days that are just bad if you want a wide viewership. Wasserman Schultz said early on that she has no plans to add debates, but other Democrats are publicly upset about the scheduling, including Democratic candidate Martin O’Malley and DNC Vice Chair Tulsi Gabbard.

See More:

More in Politics

Politics
The surprising right-wing push to keep us out of warThe surprising right-wing push to keep us out of war
Politics

Tucker Carlson, JD Vance, and Don Jr. challenged the hawkish GOP consensus. But can they win over the president?

By Andrew Prokop
Future Perfect
The stunning reversal of humanity’s oldest biasThe stunning reversal of humanity’s oldest bias
Future Perfect

Everyone wants to be a girl dad now.

By Bryan Walsh
Today, Explained podcast
What happens to DOGE without Elon Musk?What happens to DOGE without Elon Musk?
Podcast
Today, Explained podcast

Musk had big dreams. DOGE ran into reality. Here’s what will and won’t stick from the initiative.

By Denise Guerra and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s military parade is a warningTrump’s military parade is a warning
Politics

Trump has caused a crisis in civil-military relations — one that could eventually threaten democracy’s foundations.

By Zack Beauchamp
Politics
A court ordered Trump’s team to free an activist. They refused.A court ordered Trump’s team to free an activist. They refused.
Politics

It’s a case with high takes for freedom of speech and the rule of law.

By Patrick Reis
World Politics
The Israel-Iran war hinges on three big thingsThe Israel-Iran war hinges on three big things
World Politics

It’s impossible to know how this war will end. But here’s how to make sense of it.

By Zack Beauchamp