The Democrats' woes are overstated

In his article "Democrats are in denial. Their party is actually in deep trouble," Matt Yglesias points to the real problems the Democrats face in elections below the presidency. At the same time, many of these problems are similar to those faced by all parties that have controlled the White House for two terms. Political scientists often refer to the "thermostatic" nature of American public opinion, where support for activist government declines during Democratic administrations and increases during Republican ones.

A similar dynamic occurs with elections, as every party that controls the White House for two terms loses ground in down-ballot races. The table below shows the number of senators, House members, and governors at the beginning and the end of the most recent two-term presidencies. The only president who was able to beat this pattern of losing Senate, House, and gubernatorial seats was Ronald Reagan, who, while losing Senate and House seats, did manage to pick up one governor. In fact, Yglesias seems to understand this, since he writes, "So-called ‘wave' elections in which tons of incumbent lose are typically driven by a backlash against the incumbent president. Since the incumbent is a Democrat, Democrats have no way to set up a wave."

Yglesias also overstates the self-perpetuating nature of Republican advantages in non-presidential elections. According to him, "GOP control of most state legislatures lets Republicans draw boundaries in a way that is even more GOP-friendly than the natural population distribution would suggest." But most political scientists agree that gerrymandering has very little impact on House elections, adding perhaps seven to 10 seats to the GOP total in 2012.  That's enough to tip control to the Republicans in a close election, but it certainly doesn't explain the GOP's 33-seat majority in 2012 after the last round of redistricting. Moreover, redistricting does nothing to explain why the GOP was able to pick up an additional 13 seats in 2014 without any additional redistricting.

Overall, there's nothing wrong with the Democrats that losing the presidency probably won't fix, and by the same token, the best way for the Republicans to risk their majorities in the Senate, House, and governorships is to win the White House in 2016.

Philip A. Klinkner is the James S. Sherman professor and chair of the government department at Hamilton College in Clinton, New York.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via