Skip to main content

The journalism you need right now

Since Donald Trump took office, the news cycle has hit a frenetic new pitch. The daily torrent of push alerts, breaking news, and viral outrages has been relentless — and exhausting. It’s hard to tell what is real and what’s just bluster. That’s why our attention is focused on helping you make sense of it all. We want to explain what truly matters and how to think about it

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join today

Starbucks says everyone’s a customer after Philadelphia bias incident

Starbucks employees called the police on two black men in April for doing nothing. The coffee company’s changing its policies in hopes to avoid a similar incident in the future.

A woman protesting outside of a Philadelphia Starbucks in April 2018 after two black men were arrested there after employees called the police.
A woman protesting outside of a Philadelphia Starbucks in April 2018 after two black men were arrested there after employees called the police.
A woman protesting outside of a Philadelphia Starbucks in April 2018 after two black men were arrested there after employees called the police.
Mark Makela/Getty Images
Emily Stewart
Emily Stewart covered business and economics for Vox and wrote the newsletter The Big Squeeze, examining the ways ordinary people are being squeezed under capitalism. Before joining Vox, she worked for TheStreet.

Starbucks will treat anyone who walks into one of its cafes as a customer, whether or not they buy anything, the company said on Saturday. The announcement is the latest step the coffee company is taking as part of its ongoing response to the public outcry over the arrest of two black men at a Starbucks in Philadelphia. The men were waiting for a business associate to arrive and had asked to use the bathroom in April when Starbucks employees called the police, eventually leading to them being arrested and escorted out.

In a letter to employees first reported by the Wall Street Journal on Saturday, the company said “any person who enters our spaces, including patios, cafes, and restrooms, regardless of whether they make a purchase, is considered a customer.” Employees are expected to follow the company’s procedures to respond to customers who are “behaving in a disruptive manner,” including calling 911 if the person is an immediate danger, but sitting without ordering anything or asking to use the bathroom without making a purchase is now okay.

Starbucks chairman Howard Schultz earlier this month telegraphed the change while speaking at an event hosted by think tank the Atlantic Council in Washington, DC. “We don’t want to become a public bathroom,” he said. “But we’re going to make the right decision 100 percent of the time and give people the key.”

On May 29, Starbucks will close all of its 8,000 US coffee shops for the afternoon to provide racial bias training to all of its employees. The company has tapped a number of big names for the event, including former US Attorney General Eric Holder, NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund president and director-counsel Sherrilyn Ifill, and Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblatt.

The company has also undertaken efforts to streamline guidelines for all of its stores surrounding how to engage with nonpaying patrons. The guidelines for employees at the Philadelphia store where the April incident happened were for employees to ask nonpaying guests to leave — not call the police.

Starbucks’ updated policies include an ask for customers as well that they “behave in a manner that maintains a warm and welcoming environment” by using spaces as intended, being considerate of others, communicating respectfully, and acting responsibly. Employees are instructed to calmly approach customers who engage in behaviors such as smoking in the cafe, shoplifting, or making unwanted sexual advances. The men arrested in Philadelphia, of course, weren’t doing anything disruptive or wrong at all.

The Starbucks incident is part of a broader problem of white people calling the police on black people

The arrest of Rashon Nelson and Donte Robinson on April 12 in Starbucks kicked off a major firestorm. The company initially issued a less-than-satisfying apology, and CEO Kevin Johnson later issued a lengthy statement on the incident in which he apologized to the men arrested, laid out plans to investigate the incident, and affirm Starbucks’ stance against discrimination and racial profiling. “You can and should expect more from us,” he wrote. “We willlean from this and be better.”

The company soon announced the manager who called the police in Philadelphia no longer worked at the store, and Johnson met with the men arrested.

In May, Nelson and Robinson reached a settlement with the city of Philadelphia over the incident for $1 each and asked the city to fund $200,000 for a grant program for young entrepreneurs. They reached a financial agreement with Starbucks as well for an undisclosed amount as well as “continued listening and dialogue between the parties and specific action and opportunity.”

The Philadelphia Starbucks incident highlights a much broader and more pervasive problem in America: the frequency with which white people call the police on black people without cause. In recent weeks, a number of racial profiling incidents have made the news — the owner of a Pennsylvania country club called the police on five black women for playing too slowly, a black woman was violently arrested in an Alabama Waffle House over a dispute over her bill, Nordstrom apologized after calling the police in Missouri on three teenagers shopping for prom. This week, a video went viral of the police defending a black real estate investor after a white woman called the police on him.

As Vox’s PR Lockhart recently pointed out, people of color have long been subject to racial profiling in public and private spaces — what’s different now is social media and cellphone cameras that make it easier to draw attention to such incidents. But even though racial segregation is no longer legal, biases about who belongs where and when persist.

More in Politics

Is Trump lying about cutting Medicaid — or is Congress?Is Trump lying about cutting Medicaid — or is Congress?
Politics

Trump says Republicans won’t “touch” the program. But he left them a loophole.

By Patrick Reis
A Ukraine ceasefire deal is starting to come into view. Would it work?A Ukraine ceasefire deal is starting to come into view. Would it work?
Politics

It depends on two of the most undependable men on the planet.

By Joshua Keating
This animal is on the edge of extinction. Trump just fired the people trying to save it.This animal is on the edge of extinction. Trump just fired the people trying to save it.
Down to Earth

Job cuts and frozen funding could inch one of the world’s rarest species even closer to extinction.

By Benji Jones
The Supreme Court is in “radical agreement” that a bizarre DEI rule needs to goThe Supreme Court is in “radical agreement” that a bizarre DEI rule needs to go
Supreme Court

The first DEI case of Trump’s second term turns out to be an easy win against a rule that no one likes.

By Ian Millhiser
The man trying to turn prosecutors loose against Trump’s enemiesThe man trying to turn prosecutors loose against Trump’s enemies
Politics

Ed Martin went from a little-known conservative activist to US Attorney for DC — all because of Stop the Steal.

By Andrew Prokop
Will the backlash to Elon Musk hurt Republicans?Will the backlash to Elon Musk hurt Republicans?
Trump 2.0, explained

Polls show DOGE’s federal government purge is politically polarizing.

By Nicole Narea