Skip to main content

Free speech needs fearless journalism

Free speech is endangered; unbiased and trustworthy news is elusive. In a time of noise, confusion, and spin, we’re committed to clarity, truth, and depth — even when it’s hard.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

This is a photo of lawmakers discussing taking away maternity coverage

You may notice a certain group of people missing.

On Thursday, a bunch of men met at the White House to discuss taking away potentially millions of women’s coverage for pregnancy, maternity, and newborn care.

The White House meeting was broadly about the American Health Care Act, the Republican bill meant to repeal and replace Obamacare. But it was focused on whether the bill should include a repeal of 10 “essential health benefits” that insurers in the individual marketplace must cover. Among those benefits is pregnancy, maternity, and newborn care.

Yet Vice President Mike Pence, who was at the meeting along with President Donald Trump and Republican members of the House Freedom Caucus, tweeted out a picture showing that the meeting didn’t represent the exact people who most directly benefit from pregnancy, maternity, and newborn coverage in their health plans: women. This, unsurprisingly, drew quick criticism from groups like Planned Parenthood.

This isn’t a coincidence. As my colleague Sarah Kliff has explained, research shows that when women are put in positions of political power, they’re more likely than men to speak to women’s issues. So a bunch of men might have a much tougher time discussing why these benefits shouldn’t be required under health insurance regulations.

In fact, Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) has told an anecdote about the power of women in this exact debate: “During the health care debate, [Sen.] Debbie Stabenow’s sitting at a table during a somewhat boring negotiation on the Finance Committee. And one of the male senators said, ‘Well, I don’t know why we would need maternity benefits in here. I’ve never used them. Why would they be mandatory?’ And she says, ‘I bet your mother did.’”

As Klobuchar explained, “Having women at the table is incredibly important, not just for the numbers and for representing our country and equality, but also that they’re able to get things done in a unique way. Based on your own experiences, you can relate more and immediately see the unfairness of a problem that others are experiencing.”

Yet women, at least based on Pence’s picture, just weren’t present at the White House meeting to reflect those experiences.


Watch: What people miss about the gender wage gap

See More:

More in Politics

The Logoff
Did Trump’s deportation czar accept $50K in cash?Did Trump’s deportation czar accept $50K in cash?
The Logoff

The Tom Homan scandal, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Health
The flimsy evidence behind Trump’s big autism announcement, explainedThe flimsy evidence behind Trump’s big autism announcement, explained
Health

Trump is blaming Tylenol for autism. Here’s the context he’s missing.

By Dylan Scott
Politics
The comforting fiction that Charlie Kirk’s killer was far-rightThe comforting fiction that Charlie Kirk’s killer was far-right
Politics

Why some progressives lied to themselves about Tyler Robinson.

By Eric Levitz
Podcasts
Kash Patel’s weird weekKash Patel’s weird week
Podcast
Podcasts

Why Trump is happy with his FBI director despite his stumbles.

By Kelli Wessinger and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
The free speech paradoxThe free speech paradox
Politics

What Jimmy Kimmel’s suspension tells us about the tensions within a democracy.

By Sean Illing
Politics
This is how Trump ends democracyThis is how Trump ends democracy
Politics

The past week has revealed Trump’s road map to one-party rule. Will Americans let him follow it?

By Zack Beauchamp