Stephen Colbert welcoming Sean Spicer to the Emmys stage was a disappointment and a failure

To conclude his opening monologue at the 2017 Emmys, host Stephen Colbert took a moment to express some hope that this year’s ceremony would draw a record-breaking audience — and then, to preemptively confirm it, invited none other than Sean Spicer to the stage.

As the audience gasped, Spicer wheeled out a podium and bellowed, “This will be the largest audience to witness an Emmys, period, both in person and around the world.”

“Wow,” Colbert grinned, “this really soothes my fragile ego.”

The bit, of course, was a not-so-sly reference to Spicer’s very first day at work as Donald Trump’s White House press secretary, in which he angrily declared to the press that Trump’s inauguration crowd was the “largest audience to witness an inauguration, period, both in person and around the world.”

The bit was also completely unnecessary.

Colbert has spent the entirety of Trump’s time in office railing against the president’s hypocrisy, his exclusionary policies, and his affinity for telling lies whenever it’s convenient. Every night that The Late Show has been on the air has been a night that Colbert has passionately slammed Trump and his staff alike for using their power to spread falsehoods and fear.

That’s why seeing Colbert close out his monologue by sharing a chuckle with Spicer wasn’t just jarring — it was incredibly disappointing.

With this toothless punchline, Colbert and the Emmys cast a jolly sheen over Spicer’s tenure as press secretary, which began with that ridiculous lie about Trump’s inauguration crowd size and continued with him berating the press for asking after the truth while evading it with all his might. It went against everything Colbert purports to do on his fiercely pointed Late Show, and retroactively sucked the air out of any biting Trump jokes he tried to make earlier in the opening monologue.

After watching Colbert rail so hard against the Trump administration’s lies, it was downright bizarre to see him warmly welcome someone responsible for defending so many of them.

We have a request

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

1. Advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan.

2. We’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — we believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

It’s important that we have several ways we make money, and that’s why we ask readers for help keeping Vox free. Our goal today is for 47 Vox readers to pledge an annual financial gift to Vox to help us keep our work free for everyone. Will you become one of them?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$95/year

$120/year

$250/year

$350/year

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $120/year

Yes, I'll give $120/year

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via