Skip to main content

Democracy needs journalism. Journalism needs you.

Fearless journalism is more important than ever. When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join today

California is ending a rule that helped cause its housing crisis

Gov. Newsom signed bills ending single-family-only zoning, a step toward addressing the housing crisis.

A duplex in the Jefferson Manor neighborhood in Alexandria, Virginia, on July 21, 2020.
A duplex in the Jefferson Manor neighborhood in Alexandria, Virginia, on July 21, 2020.
A duplex in the Jefferson Manor neighborhood in Alexandria, Virginia, on July 21, 2020.
Bonnie Jo Mount/Washington Post via Getty Images

With a stroke of his pen, Gov. Gavin Newsom has officially ended the over 100-year scourge of single-family-only zoning in California.

Single-family-only zoning laws make it illegal to build anything but a single-family home on a particular lot of land. Now (with small exceptions like for fire-prone areas) it is also legal to build duplexes.

That change was part of a suite of housing production bills Newsom signed into law on Thursday, continuing a years-long trend of California pushing forward as one of the few states attempting to tackle the housing supply crisis.

The bills had remained unsigned on the governor’s desk, presumably until after Newsom had a chance to handily deal with the recall challenge that had threatened his tenure. California’s housing affordability crisis and resulting homelessness crisis were key parts of the frustration building in a state where Zillow says the typical home is valued at $708,936 (more than double the typical US home value of $303,288).

Vox’s German Lopez is here to guide you through the Biden administration’s burst of policymaking. Sign up to receive our newsletter each Friday.

While overhauling single-family-only zoning might sound revolutionary, the bills are gentle attempts at increasing density: legalizing duplexes and quadplexes and making it easier to build small apartment buildings that provide up to 10 homes. This doesn’t mean single-family homes are outlawed or can no longer be built, but it provides homeowners the option to convert their homes into duplexes or sell their homes to people who want to do so. Before now, it was illegal for someone to convert their home to a duplex on a lot zoned for single-family zoning. Not anymore.

This isn’t a panacea for housing production. UC Berkeley’s Terner Center for Housing Innovation found that SB 9 (the bill that legalizes duplexes) will “modestly accelerate the addition of new units relative to the status quo.” Other laws that restrict the building of new and more affordable homes are still in effect — in particular, local laws around minimum lot sizes will continue to make it illegal to turn single-family homes into duplexes if the existing lot is too small to subdivide while still adhering to the size regulations.

However, the Terner Center finds that “approximately 700,000 new, market-feasible homes would be enabled under SB 9.” That’s a lot! But because many people won’t want to sell their homes or subdivide them themselves, “only a share of that potential is likely to be developed, particularly in the near term. ... As such, while important, the new units unlocked by SB 9 would represent a fraction of the overall supply needed to fully address the state’s housing shortage.”

Previous incremental progress on housing production came in the form of ADU (accessory dwelling unit) legalization — for constructing backyard apartments or converting garages into homes. This added more than 20,000 new homes to the state’s housing supply.

This is still the beginning of a long fight to make it easier to build affordable housing in California, but it’s a big moment. Ending single-family-only zoning had long been thought of as impossible. California is pushing the possibilities frontier of states taking action where localities have failed with respect to producing enough housing for their populations. And they’re not the first to pursue a policy in this vein: In 2019, Oregon passed a bill mandating that any city with over 10,000 people allow duplexes in areas zoned for single-family-only housing. This effectively banned single-family-only zoning in that state as well.

This achievement was hard-won by legislators and pro-housing advocates who helped elect them, and it signals a shift in who is deemed responsible for fixing the housing crisis. Housing is still largely seen as a local issue, but as the regional and even national effects begin to be widely recognized, states are feeling the pressure to take action.

“The end of exclusionary, single-unit zoning in California is a historic moment — we’ve taken a huge step toward making California a more affordable, equitable, and inclusive state,” Brian Hanlon, CEO of California YIMBY, said in a statement.

More in Technology

Elon Musk and Bernie Sanders are both right about immigrationElon Musk and Bernie Sanders are both right about immigration
Policy

The H-1B visa system is deeply flawed — and good for America.

By Eric Levitz
The broligarchs have a vision for the new Trump term. It’s darker than you think.The broligarchs have a vision for the new Trump term. It’s darker than you think.
Future Perfect

The real reason Musk, Zuckerberg, and Bezos are supporting Trump.

By Sigal Samuel
Your phone is destroying your social lifeYour phone is destroying your social life
Audio
The Gray Area

Technology and the cost of convenience, explained.

By Sean Illing
The bright side of TikTok’s downfallThe bright side of TikTok’s downfall
Technology

The end of one wildly popular platform is a chance to overhaul the broken social media industry.

By Adam Clark Estes
The Supreme Court’s decision upholding the TikTok ban, explainedThe Supreme Court’s decision upholding the TikTok ban, explained
Supreme Court

Nothing in the Court’s TikTok opinion should surprise anyone who has followed the case.

By Ian Millhiser
Has TikTok made us better? Or much, much worse?Has TikTok made us better? Or much, much worse?
Culture

The case for and against TikTok as a cultural force.

By Rebecca Jennings