Scott Pruitt resigns: It took 3 hours for the EPA to tell staff they had a new boss

Scott Pruitt, administrator of the US Environmental Protection Agency, resigned Thursday after the festering pile of alleged ethical and legal breaches — including the $43,000 phone booth, his use of his staffers’ credit cards to make hotel bookings, the deletion of meetings from his calendar and subsequent firing of staff who questioned it — finally became too much for him to manage.

But for three hours, staff at the EPA received no formal announcement, no agency-wide email, about their boss’s resignation. According to three EPA employees I contacted who asked not to be named because they were not authorized to speak on the record, they learned of it from a Trump tweet:

And then from Fox News’s Fin Gomez, who posted Pruitt’s resignation letter on Twitter:

We are now accustomed to such breaches of protocol in the Trump administration. We’ve long known there’s been an absence of high-level leadership at the EPA and that Pruitt had little respect for the agency he led.

But it’s still remarkable that neither Pruitt nor the internal communications team felt obligated to inform the 14,100 employees of the EPA until three hours after the Trump tweet that as of Monday, Andrew Wheeler, Pruitt’s deputy and a former coal lobbyist, will take the helm.

“I will be the Acting Administrator,” the memo, sent at 6:46 pm from Wheeler, reads. “I am both humbled and honored to take on this new responsibility at the same agency where I started my career over 25 years ago.” (The memo makes no explicit mention of Pruitt’s resignation.)

The EPA employees I spoke to said they were not that surprised to have learned the news from Trump’s Twitter and the media. One noted that bad news rarely gets acknowledged internally anymore.

The EPA “is so dysfunctional these days that all the ‘normal’ protocol seems to have disappeared,” another told me.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via