The White House statement on the Mueller indictments had a glaring omission

The White House’s reaction to special counsel Robert Mueller’s indictments of 12 Russian spies on Friday included zero condemnation of Russia for interfering in a US presidential election.

Instead, it focused on bolstering President Donald Trump’s longtime arguments that there was “no collusion” between his campaign and Russia and that the interference didn’t change the outcome of the election.

The White House highlighted three key quotes from Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s Friday press conference announcing the indictments, which specifically addressed those two points:

What the White House statement didn’t choose to include, however, were quotes from Rosenstein about the need to “hold the perpetrators accountable” and “protect against future interference.”

Calling out Russia for launching a malicious attack on American democracy wasn’t a priority for the White House, it seems — a glaring omission many on Twitter noticed immediately:

As Vox’s Andrew Prokop reports, Mueller filed an indictment on Friday afternoon against 12 Russian intelligence officers for crimes related to hacking and publicly releasing Democrats’ emails, allegedly as part of an effort to sway the 2016 presidential campaign.

The indictment offers more details around the high-profile hackings of the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, massive breaches that took place during the 2016 election. It ties both cyberattacks to intelligence officers from Russia’s military intelligence agency, the GRU.

What the indictment does not do, however, is allege that any Americans or any members of the Trump campaign were criminally involved in the hacking or leaks. As its statement makes very clear, the White House wanted to make sure that was the top takeaway.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via