Giuliani: Trump “probably” can pardon himself. Trump: I “absolutely” can pardon myself.

On Monday morning, President Donald Trump tweeted that he “absolutely” had the power to pardon himself in the event that he is charged with obstructing justice in the investigation into Russia’s efforts to influence the 2016 presidential election (or with anything else).

And his attorney, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, agreed — sort of. He said Trump “probably” could but the chances of it actually happening are “unthinkable.”

During an appearance on ABC News’s This Week, Giuliani hedged hard on two questions related to a potential self-pardon: whether Trump could pardon himself, and whether Trump would pardon himself. After saying that Trump “probably” has the power to self-pardon, Giuliani said of such an event, “It’s not going to happen. It’s a hypothetical point,” and added that doing so would be “unthinkable.”

It’s another example of both Trumpworld and Trump being out of step on a major point of policymaking and the president’s thinking. Who knows what’s really going on.

And legal scholars are far from united on whether a president could self-pardon. Scholars like Jonathan Turley, a constitutional law professor at George Washington University, argue that Trump could pardon himself. (Though, in his words, such an act would be “ignoble and self-defeating.”) But others strongly disagree.

What the Constitution (might) say on self-pardons

As my colleague Sean Illing detailed in April, one potential roadblock to a presidential self-pardon could be in the Constitution’s “take care clause” — the president “shall take care that the Laws be faithfully executed” — which some scholars take to mean that the president could not self-pardon, as it’s inherently in his own self-interest.

Fordham law professor Jed Shugerman says, “Clearly, a self-pardon is a breach of fiduciary duty because it’s manifestly self-interested. But if a president managed to do this, the following administration could try to prosecute the president, which would force a court to examine that president’s self-pardon and decide whether or not it was invalid on the grounds that it violated his fiduciary duty to serve the best interests of the people over himself.”

It’s worth noting that the last time presidential self-pardons came into question, during the Watergate scandal, the Department of Justice ruled that presidents could not, in fact, self-pardon, as “no one may be a judge in his own case.”

As much as scholars are divided on what Trump could do, the president’s world is divided on just what he would do.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via