Skip to main content

Believe that journalism can make a difference

If you believe in the work we do at Vox, please support us by becoming a member. Our mission has never been more urgent. But our work isn’t easy. It requires resources, dedication, and independence. And that’s where you come in.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Support Vox

The Trump administration misspelled “separation” in an executive order on family separation

As initially published, the order addressed family “seperation.”

Li Zhou
Li Zhou is a politics reporter at Vox, where she covers Congress and elections. Previously, she was a tech policy reporter at Politico and an editorial fellow at the Atlantic.

The Trump administration released its highly anticipated executive order on family separation Wednesday afternoon. And in the grand tradition of many Trump White House documents, something wasn’t quite right.

See if you can spot it:

White House

That’s right: The order meant to address family separation misspelled “separation.”

While the misspelling was quickly fixed, the latest example of the Trump administration’s ongoing struggles in that domain (see: the Department of Education Snapchat) left the impression that the executive order had been prepared hastily.

The White House’s executive order addresses the administration’s controversial “zero tolerance” policy that criminally prosecutes all adults entering the United States illegally. As part of this policy, adults were held in federal jail while awaiting trial and their children were put in federal custody, forcing family separations.

The executive order aims to hold families together in immigrant detention as their cases are being processed. Parents will still be prosecuted, but they will be able to remain with their children in custody of the Department of Homeland Security.

“It is also the policy of this Administration to maintain family unity, including by detaining alien families together where appropriate and consistent with law and available resources,” the order reads. “It is unfortunate that Congress’s failure to act and court orders have put the Administration in the position of separating alien families to effectively enforce the law.”

More in Politics

The madman theory of Trump and tariffsThe madman theory of Trump and tariffs
PoliticsMember Exclusive

Would Trump actually trigger an economic crisis to try and win a trade war?

By Andrew Prokop
Are North Carolina Republicans trying to steal a state supreme court seat?Are North Carolina Republicans trying to steal a state supreme court seat?
PoliticsMember Exclusive

Allison Riggs won the seat by 734 votes, but her opponent is trying to invalidate 60,000.

By Ellen Ioanes
Trump asks the Supreme Court to place him even further above the lawTrump asks the Supreme Court to place him even further above the law
Supreme CourtMember Exclusive

Trump is appealing to the same six Republicans who already ruled that he has broad immunity from the law. So he’s probably going to win.

By Ian Millhiser
9 predictions for Trump’s second term9 predictions for Trump’s second term
On the RightMember Exclusive

What the author of Vox’s newsletter on conservatism thinks will happen — and why.

By Zack Beauchamp
The danger of Meta’s big fact-checking changesThe danger of Meta’s big fact-checking changes
PoliticsMember Exclusive

Mark Zuckerberg’s efforts to cozy up to Trump have concerning consequences.

By Li Zhou
What banning medical debt from your credit score actually meansWhat banning medical debt from your credit score actually means
PolicyMember Exclusive

The Biden administration announced the rule Tuesday, but it might not last under Trump.

By Ellen Ioanes