Monica Lewinsky says she was uninvited from an event about “social change” because Bill Clinton was a guest

Monica Lewinsky set off a firestorm after she claimed she was uninvited from an event — because former President Bill Clinton was asked to attend.

“Please don’t invite me to an event (esp one about social change) and then — after i’ve accepted — uninvite me because bill clinton then decided to attend/was invited,” Lewinsky tweeted. “It’s 2018.”

Lewinsky addressed her criticism to “dear world” but added a postscript that called out a magazine for trying to offer her a byline in exchange for the rescinded invite.

The callout led to speculation that Lewinsky was referring to Town & Country magazine, which hosted its annual Philanthropy Summit on Wednesday, where Clinton delivered introductory remarks.

HuffPost said it confirmed with attendees that Lewinsky was uninvited from the event.

Clinton’s press secretary responded to the HuffPost article in a statement on Twitter. Angel Ureña tweeted that the former president was invited to the summit and “gladly accepted.”

“Neither he nor his staff knew anything about the invitation or it being rescinded.”

Lewinsky’s apparent disinvitation drew criticism on Twitter, with many expressing support for Lewinsky.

Town and Country apologized to Lewinsky in a Thursday morning tweet, and the publication said it regretted the way the “situation was handled.”

Lewinsky’s comments sparked outrage because she alluded to a blind spot revealed by the #MeToo movement when it comes to protecting powerful men. Lewinsky wrestled with this in a March essay for Vanity Fair, writing that the #MeToo movement forced her to grapple with consent regarding her affair with the president 20 years ago. “I now see how problematic it was that the two of us even got to a place where there was a question of consent,” she wrote.

The abuse of power is often inextricable from the stories of sexual harassment and assault, from Harvey Weinstein to Eric Schneiderman. It protects men in positions of authority and helps silence those would who would speak out. Lewinsky, and others, rightly pointed out the hypocrisy of an event about “social change” that not only deferred to the person in power but seemingly excluded a voice advocating for that very change.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via