Jeff Bezos doesn’t care if you think Amazon is too powerful

On Tuesday, Amazon abruptly suspended construction on the buildout of additional office real estate in its hometown of Seattle. The company said it was waiting to see how the city council votes this month on a proposal that would tax Amazon and other big Seattle employers about $500 per local employee.

The funds — an estimated $75 million a year with around a third of that coming from Amazon — would be earmarked for initiatives to help stem Seattle’s homeless crisis through programs for the homeless and the development of low-income housing units.

In ordinary times, a leverage game like this one between a city’s biggest employer and its government leaders might be viewed as a hardball negotiating tactic and nothing more.

But these are not ordinary times — certainly not for Amazon. The Seattle-based e-commerce giant is facing a growing narrative, supported by President Donald Trump, that it has grown far too powerful.

From specific concerns about its delivery deal with the U.S. Postal Service and its sales tax advantage over brick-and-mortar stores to the conditions and pay of the hundreds of thousands of warehouse works whose grunt work makes one-click online shopping possible, you’d think Amazon might feel on the defensive. And act that way.

And in Seattle specifically, the company is often the target of disdain among longtime residents as real estate prices have skyrocketed in conjunction with Amazon’s buildout of its giant new downtown city campus. The company has agreed to give a 65-room homeless shelter free space in one of its headquarter buildings starting in 2020.

But instead of maintaining a low profile, Amazon has opted to stop, pose and flex all of those muscles that it has built up over two-plus decades in Seattle.

An Amazon spokesperson told the New York Times that the company was pausing “construction planning” of a new giant office building “pending the outcome of the head tax vote by City Council.” The company was also “evaluating options” to rent out space to others in another building it planned to take over, the paper reported.

These are not the actions of a company that is concerned about the perception of being too powerful. Nor was the cross-country HQ2 contest for its new headquarters, which has been a brilliant marketing campaign, but one that also comes across as out of touch with the power disparity it puts on display.

Amazon continues to act like it’s invincible. It better hope it’s right.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via