The network TV upfronts, explained by a millennial

It’s upfronts season! If that doesn’t mean anything to you, don’t worry. I, a millennial human being, went to the NBCUniversal* upfront at Radio City Music Hall, and I have returned to explain it all.

Basically, the upfronts are a chance for TV networks to show off the upcoming season’s programs in the hope that ad buyers will spend money on ads to run alongside those programs. Networks offer better rates if advertisers buy space ahead of time — or up front — which is why it’s a big deal for both sides.

The trouble is, fewer people — especially young people — are watching traditional pay TV. That hasn’t seemed to bother advertisers, who’ve continued to increase spending at the upfronts.

But with the specter of tech companies like Netflix, Facebook and Apple creating their own content, networks are scared. Upfront spending is likely to decline this year, according to research firm Magna Global. Critically, prime-time viewership among the 18- to 49-year-olds is down 9 percent from last year, according to Nielsen.

In other words, the networks need more people like me to watch its shows.

Networks are having to make the case that they are producing great content that lots of people will watch. They’ll be so rapt they’ll even watch the commercials. To do so, they subjected an audience to two and a half hours of celebrity banter, live performances and mostly lots and lots of TV trailers.

The women’s Olympic ice hockey team rose out of the floor. I actually watched the Olympics (online!) so I knew their reason for being there, but didn’t understand why they were coming out of the floor:

I saw Patton Oswalt, whom I like, but didn’t know that he was on an NBC show — clearly I haven’t watched it.

Simon Cowell came onstage along with a young woman aping a ventriloquist version of him. He’s apparently still making “America’s Got Talent” and it’s airing on something called “NBC Alternative.” I didn’t realize “America’s Got Talent” was still on, but I do remember it from when I was a lot younger.

Many of the other celebrity appearances were prerecorded. Some of the shows looked promising, like Mike Schur’s live bar comedy “Abby’s,” Amy Poehler’s mom-com “I Feel Bad,” and maybe Robert Zemeckis‎’s “Lost”-like drama, “Manifest.”

Nothing looked as good as the trailers for the stuff I’ve recently watched online: Hulu’s “Handmaid’s Tale,” HBO’s “Silicon Valley” or Netflix’s “Wild, Wild Country” and “Ugly Delicious.”

At its best, the upfront was funny (thanks, Seth Meyers!) and at its worst, it was cringeworthy (World Wrestling Entertainment’s Stephanie McMahon, making a case for how WWE is changing the world for the better, used the tagline: “This is hope. This is WWE.”).

Mostly it was a lot of trailers I could have watched at home but wouldn’t. There was dramatic music and camerawork. You were supposed to feel something. I didn’t.

Toward the end, NBC Chairman of Advertising Sales Linda Yaccarino did a fun bit where she spoofed Mark Zuckerberg’s Congressional hearings, fielding unknowing questions from lawmakers.

Onstage, she made the case for advertising on TV. “No family has ever gathered around a newsfeed before,” she said. “We’re not in the ‘Likes’ business, we’re in the results business.”

If you’re trying to sell billions of dollars in ads, perhaps you should be.

* NBCUniversal is a minority investor in Vox Media, which owns Recode.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via