clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Trump taps private equity billionaire for intelligence advisory role

Trump plans to nominate Stephen Feinberg, billionaire financier and co-CEO of private equity firm Cerberus Capital, President’s Intelligence Advisory Board.

President Trump Greets The Three Americans Freed From North Korea Upon Their Arrival Back In The U.S.
U.S. President Donald Trump casts a shadow as he greets the three Americans just released from North Korea, Kim Dong Chul, Kim Hak-song and Tony Kim, upon their arrival on May 10, 2018 at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland. 
Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images
Emily Stewart covers business and economics for Vox and writes the newsletter The Big Squeeze, examining the ways ordinary people are being squeezed under capitalism. Before joining Vox, she worked for TheStreet.

Things have not gone particularly well for the ultra wealthy individuals who have tied themselves to the Trump administration. (See: Tom Barrack, Betsy DeVos, Wilbur Ross, Carl Icahn, along with all those CEO council members who stepped down post-Charlottesville.) And yet they keep coming. The latest addition: Stephen Feinberg, billionaire financier and co-chief executive of Cerberus Capital Management, a private equity firm based in New York.

The White House on Friday announced Trump’s plans to appoint Feinberg, 58, to become chairman of the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board, a group that reviews the intelligence community. Created under President Dwight Eisenhower in 1956, the board’s job is to provide independent advice to the president on the quality and adequacy intelligence activities.

Under Trump, the board hasn’t had any members. Feinberg, however, doesn’t have any experience in the intelligence field. His Cerberus Capital does own defense contractor DynCorp, which derives most of its $3 billion in annual revenue from the government.

The White House appears to think Feinberg’s lack of intelligence experience won’t be problematic. In a press release announcing the pick, the administration said he brings “over 30 years of experience conducting organizational assessments, operational improvements, and complex reforms across foreign and domestic stakeholders” to his position. He co-founded Cerberus in 1992 and according to his firm’s website held positions in the finance industry before that.

Trump has wanted Feinberg to be in intelligence for a while

Feinberg has been vaguely in Trump’s orbit and rumored to be taking some sort of post under him for quite some time. In February 2017, soon after the president took office, NBC News reported Trump had asked Feinberg to conduct a review of US intelligence agencies and other aspects of the federal government. Trump called Feinberg “a very talented man, very successful man,” at the time, and said, “He’s offered his services and you know, it’s something we may take advantage of.”

But there was a hiccup: Feinberg’s business ties. A senior administration official told NBC News that Feinberg still needed clearance from the Office of Government Ethics, which would be complicated to accomplish, given Cerberbus’ complex business setup.

In March 2017, however, Feinberg joined Trump and Defense Secretary Jim Mattis on a trip to see a new aircraft carrier in Newport News, Virginia, Bloomberg reported. That same month, also per Bloomberg, Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) in a Senate hearing said she was worried about “an individual who runs a private equity firm” and lacking experience in intelligence being tapped for an intel oversight job.

The New York Times in July 2017 that then-White House strategist Steve Bannon and the president’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, had asked Feinberg and private security firm Blackwater founder Erik Prince to devise private-sector alternatives to sending additional troops to Afghanistan.

Feinberg’s participation raised eyebrows, given Cerberus’ ownership of DynCorp and the fact that the advice he provided could be used to ultimately benefit his company. He reportedly made recommendations that would, in fact, serve him. The New Yorker’s Stephen Witt outlined the potential conflicts at the time:

Through DynCorp, Feinberg already controls one of the largest military contractors in the U.S., one which trains Afghanistan’s police force and assists in their narcotics-trafficking countermeasures. According to the Times, Feinberg proposed an expanded role for such contractors, and also recommended transferring the command of paramilitary operations in the country to the C.I.A., increasing their operating footprint while decreasing both transparency and accountability. He reportedly discussed Afghanistan with President Trump in person.

The proposals raise obvious questions about war profiteering and conflicts of interest. DynCorp has been a bad investment for Feinberg. Buying at the tail end of the military-contracting boom of the two-thousands, Cerberus overpaid for the company, then watched as much of its business evaporated following government-spending cuts and the drawdown of U.S. troops in in Iraq and Afghanistan. In the seven years since Cerberus acquired the company, Feinberg has replaced DynCorp’s CEO four times.

Of course, President Trump has rarely been deterred by lack of experience or potential conflicts. Feinberg appears to now be in line for the intelligence advisory board spot.

Feinberg’s predecessors as chair under the Obama administration include physicist Shirley Jackson, former CIA deputy director for intelligence Jami Miscik, former Oklahoma governor and Senate Intelligence Committee chairman David Boren, and former Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel.

To be sure, that Trump is putting someone in charge of the Presidential Intelligence Advisory Board is potentially a good thing. As Foreign Policy noted, Trump had failed to nominate anyone to the board until recently. There have been reports the president might tap another billionaire — venture capitalist Peter Thiel — to the oversight role, but apparently he didn’t get the job. And it’s not clear how effective or influential the board will be, because that largely depends on Feinberg’s ambitions and his proximity to the president.

Trump has expressed a deep skepticism of the intelligence community, and some of his supporters appear to buy into the idea of a “deep state” of bureaucrats out to get him. Feinberg might have his work cut out for him.