Debbie Stabenow reelected to the Senate

Veteran legislator Debbie Stabenow won reelection to a fourth term Tuesday night, the conclusion of a Senate campaign that ended up being a lot less interesting than it initially seemed like it might be.

Donald Trump shocked the world — and certainly the Democratic Party — by narrowly carrying Michigan in 2016 after slumping African-American turnout and defections from white working-class voters. That made Stabenow a natural target in 2018, and Kid Rock spent much of 2017 threatening to challenge her as part of what seemed like it could be a larger Trumpification of American politics.

Instead, that turned out to be a mere publicity stunt (as many initially, and wrongly, thought Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign would be), and Stabenow wound up facing off against John James, a 37-year-old African-American business leader and first-time candidate who’d probably be a formidable contender for a lower office but didn’t qualify as a top-tier recruit for a statewide race. James was, indeed, sufficiently obscure that Rudy Giuliani mistakenly endorsed “Don James” in the final week of the campaign.

On top of relatively weak opposition, Stabenow’s fortunes were lifted not just by a strong national political environment for Democrats but by a particularly strong local political environment in Michigan.

Gretchen Whitmer, the Democratic nominee, spent the entire campaign with a prohibitive lead over her opponent in the gubernatorial race, and the incumbent Republican governor refused to endorse GOP nominee Bill Schuette. Amid the general atmosphere of chaos in the state party, Stabenow ended up largely cruising to victory, running plenty of ads highlighting her day-to-day work on relatively uncontroversial topics like VA clinics, funding for Alzheimer’s research, and bolstering of Michigan agriculture.

Stabenow’s victory, though not a huge shock, is — along with other Democratic wins in the Rust Belt — a confirmation that Trump’s narrow wins in the Midwest may have been more of a one-off than a realignment in the making.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via