clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Martha McSally lost the Arizona Senate race. She could still be a senator next year.

McConnell is reportedly trying to get her to replace Sen. John Kyl.

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
Li Zhou is a politics reporter at Vox, where she covers Congress and elections. Previously, she was a tech policy reporter at Politico and an editorial fellow at the Atlantic.

Republican Martha McSally has officially lost the Arizona Senate race to Democrat Kyrsten Sinema, but Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnnell may still find a way for her to serve in the Senate next year.

CNN reported on Tuesday that “McConnell and other national Republican powerhouses” are advocating for McSally to serve out the the term of Arizona Sen. Jon Kyl — who was appointed earlier this summer to replace Sen. John McCain.

The next election for this seat won’t be held until 2020, but Kyl has said that he only intends to serve until January 2019 — at which point, Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey will have to appoint someone new to tide the state over until the following year.

State law requires that Ducey appoint someone of the same party as McCain and Kyl, which means he’ll have to pick a Republican — and McSally seems to be very much in the running.

“I can’t think of anybody more qualified than Martha McSally,” Kyl told CNN last week.

Why McSally might be a tough choice

There’s certainly precedent for previous Senate candidates getting appointed to seats after they’ve been defeated, though the rapid-fire timing on this is uncommon. Wyoming Sen. John Barrasso lost his Republican Senate primary in 1996, for example, and was appointed to take on a Senate seat in 2007 after Sen. Craig Thomas died.

The ultimate closeness of the race — which had the two candidates separated by 1.7 percentage points when it was called — could play in McSally’s favor, says University of Arizona professor Lisa Sanchez. This margin is close enough to mean that “she would not be an unpopular choice for nearly half of Arizona voters,” she says.

What remains unclear, however, is whether McSally ranks that highly on Ducey’s list.

“I certainly think that McSally is in the mix of possible candidates to replace Kyl, but she is not the only candidate,” says Cook Political Report’s Jennifer Duffy. “Ducey has to please a lot of constituencies with this pick, especially since whoever gets the appointment has to run in 2020 and 2022.”

Another political expert offered an even more definitive take shortly after the election concluded, noting that two Arizona sources had said that McSally was, in fact, out of the running already. “For a long time, I thought McSally replacing Kyl was a good bet, assuming McSally lost to Sinema,” the expert said. “Recently, two of my solid AZ contacts have told me it is not going to happen. ... I tried to find out why and, if this is true, why McSally was not going to be the choice. Radio silence.”

McConnell is reportedly trying to turn that narrative around.

While much of this is still pure speculation, there are several possible reasons Ducey could go with someone other than McSally — ranging from stigma over appointing a recent electoral “loser” to a key seat to questions over whom the broader Arizona Republican Party would like to potentially support. McSally has faced fierce challenges from the right in the past, not to mention alienated some when she distanced herself from McCain during the election.

Another big X-factor here is President Trump. Though Arizona Republicans like to style themselves as independent of him, it’s possible that the president weighing in strongly on Kyl’s replacement, one way or another, could sway things.

Any of these issues could potentially put McSally at a disadvantage for Kyl’s seat — though it’s still a little early to tell whether this would be the case.