Venture firm IVP has raised its biggest fund yet at $1.5 billion

With valuations of private companies climbing higher and higher, some venture capital firms have a simple solution: Larger funds.

IVP, the firm founded 35 years ago that specializes in later-stage investments, on Tuesday said it had raised its largest fund yet — a $1.5 billion pool of money that is their 16th in the venture business.

Some of IVP’s most well-known investments in recent years include Twitter, Slack, Dropbox and Snap, though they tended to invest in those companies after some earlier-stage venture firms had discovered them.

IVP said their ability and eagerness to deploy so much cash showed that the firm was an “island of stability in the midst of the storm.”

“There’s been all kinds of bad publicity about the venture business. Valuations are too high. There’s too much money in the sector. People misbehaving,” Sandy Miller, one of the firm’s general partners, told Recode. IVP’s fund is “basically a validation that this is a healthy environment.”

IVP expects to invest in 35 to 40 companies over the 10-year fund’s lifespan; check sizes range from $10 million to $100 million.

The firm is still awaiting several large exits from some of its prospects. Dropbox is strongly expected to go public either late this year or early next year; Slack’s path toward an IPO was perhaps delayed by the millions it just accepted from SoftBank’s $100 billion Vision Fund.

Miller said, though, that the Vision Fund could be a force for good.

“The Vision Fund is a wild card but could be a significant factor in terms of exits for venture,” he said, explaining that investors have “new vehicles” for liquidity by possibly selling their stakes to SoftBank.

And as for Snap, which has sharply fallen since going public earlier this year?

“We’ve been disappointed with what happened in the public marketplace,” Miller said. “Whatever companies are losing money and have this high a profile — they’re going to be very volatile in the public market. But volatility can go in both directions.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via