Here’s why publishers won’t stop pivoting to video

Time for another round of “pivoting to video” chatter, promoted by yet another story about a digital publisher “pivoting to video” by laying off people who don’t make video.

In this case it’s Mic, a millennial-focused (of course) startup that pre-wrote its own take on the story a week ago via a guest post on this very site.

For a much more bracing view on The Great Video Pivot, I suggest this thread from Josh Marshall, whose Talking Points Memo has flourished during the Trump administration, and who is very, very down on video.

Here’s the start:

A couple notes:

• I’ve been working for digital publishers for a long time — so long that when I started out, Facebook was something only college kids used — so I can tell you that publishers have been chasing video dollars for a long time. It predates Facebook, but it has very much been accelerated by Facebook and Facebook’s desire to chase video dollars.
• Digital publishers have always had a good argument when they wanted to chase video dollars: There will be a lot of them, if we can just get people to watch our videos and advertisers to pay for them.
• Usually this is accompanied by a reference toward the $70 billion-plus TV ad market, and to the total time people spend watching TV: An astonishing four hours and 55 minutes a day, even in 2017.

Nielsen

• As long as those two statistics are in place, publishers are going to keep chasing video dollars — even though few of them are transferring over to digital video. It won’t stop. The thought of capturing a sliver of that attention — and those dollars — is too compelling.
• Can’t you make great video that people will want to watch? Of course you can. My corporate colleagues at Vox.com regularly do. They’ve been nominated for four Emmys this year.
• The great counter to all of this is: Autoplaying video. If people wanted to watch as much digital video as digital publishers would like, they wouldn’t have to automatically start playing videos for them as soon as they land on a web page, or scroll through a Facebook feed, or open up Twitter.
• Facebook says its users watch autoplaying videos for an average of 16.7 seconds. That’s it. And Facebook thinks that’s a good number.
• It’s reasonable to think that this gets sorted out, eventually, and advertiser demand and user demand will sync up. Some people may make a lot of money when it happens. But it’s going to be rough going for some time. More pivots ahead.

* Postscript: “Swivey” doesn’t mean “turn,” exactly. I think. But I’ve been dying to embed this for a long time, and it’s much more fun than a Byrds video.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

We have a request

Vox's journalism is free because we believe that everyone deserves to understand the world that they live in. That kind of knowledge helps create better citizens, neighbors, friends, parents, consumers and stewards of this planet. In short, understanding benefits everyone. You can join in on this mission by making a financial gift to Vox today. Reader support helps keep our work free, for everyone. Will you join us?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$95/year

$120/year

$250/year

$350/year

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $120/year

Yes, I'll give $120/year

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via