Facebook’s and Twitter’s executive leadership are still the most white among big Silicon Valley companies

Google’s latest diversity report confirmed what we all know about prestige jobs at Silicon Valley tech companies: Despite incremental gains in diversity, these jobs still overwhelmingly go to white males.

But how do tech companies compare to one another? While most of the internal stats came out last year, it’s helpful to see how companies stack up against each other as we get more data.

By charting some major tech companies’ latest diversity statistics, a few patterns arise. For leadership — a category that usually includes director-level or above — Twitter and Apple have a slightly higher rate of women in those positions — though none of the companies measured has over 30 percent female leadership. Remember, women are 50 percent of the population. Intel and Microsoft have the lowest rates of women in leadership.

Amazon leads slightly as far as employing people of color in top roles, but Amazon measures managers, not directors, as leadership. Twitter and Facebook have the whitest leadership.

Women tend to be even less represented in technology jobs than leadership jobs. Amazon has the highest rate, with 26.7 percent women in “professional” positions, which includes software developers among other jobs.

Since Asians tend to be over-represented in technology jobs, obscuring how few other non-whites are hired, we included that group when comparing tech jobs. Apple had the highest share of non-white, non-Asians in tech jobs, including an 8 percent black and 8 percent Hispanic tech workforce. Facebook had the lowest rate of non-white, non-Asians in tech jobs at about 6 percent.

Note: Gender figures are global whereas race numbers are for the U.S. For Amazon technology jobs, I used the “professionals” section on the company’s government diversity report, which includes software developers; leadership jobs at Amazon are management level or above. I included two or more races and “other” (often includes Native American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander) as non-white.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via