clock menu more-arrow no yes

Sean Spicer still thinks Trump Jr. met with Russians because of adoption

White House press secretary Sean Spicer returned to the podium Monday afternoon for an off-camera press briefing at which he reportedly told journalists that “there was nothing as far as we know that would lead anyone to believe” Donald Trump Jr.’s June 2016 meeting with a Kremlin-linked attorney was not about adoption policy.

New York Times chief White House correspondent Peter Baker shared the quote:

According to Politico, Spicer refused to discuss the meeting further and referred questions to outside counsel. Glenn Thrush, also of the New York Times, responded in all caps, pointing out why the statement was so absurd:

Trump Jr. released images of his own emails on Twitter in order to preempt a New York Times scoop that he had attended the meeting, along with Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort and current White House senior adviser and Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner, in order to acquire incriminating information about Hillary Clinton “as part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”

Trump Jr.’s now-infamous response was: “If it’s what you say I love it especially later in the summer.”

While meeting attendees have agreed that the meeting turned to issues of the Magnitsky Act and the subsequent suspension by the Russian government of US adoption of Russian children, the premise of the meeting appears to have had nothing to do with adoption. (Nowhere in the email chain was the issue of adoption mentioned.)

Moreover, according to an ex-CIA operative’s interview with Vox’s Sean Illing, using the Magnitsky Act as a cover wouldn’t have been an unusual move for the Russian intelligence agencies seeking influence:

If you're an intelligence agency or officer, you never walk up to somebody that you want to recruit or influence and tell them directly that you want to recruit or influence them. You act upon them indirectly, whether they’re witting or unwitting or complicit — and all of those things are slightly different. But in any case, you always have a cover story — always. And you always act in a way that can be masked.

So in this case, the meeting is allegedly to discuss the Magnitsky Act. One, that is a specific objective that the Russians are seeking to effect both overtly and covertly, and through influence operations by shaping perceptions, by buying people off, by providing information that leads toward their objectives, and by developing sources.

So perhaps the meeting was about adoption policy. There is still plenty of evidence that suggests that’s not all it was about.

Here’s Spicer’s full quote, which Baker shared a short time later: