Facebook is trying yet again to cut clickbait headlines from your News Feed

Facebook is tweaking its News Feed algorithm to fight a familiar foe: Clickbait, or articles that Facebook says “withhold information intentionally” or “mislead people, forcing them to click to find out the answer.”

If this sounds familiar, it should. This is the third time Facebook has tweaked its algorithm since late 2014 with the sole purpose of fighting clickbait stories.

What’s different this time around? Facebook says it’s getting more specific about how to minimize the reach of a clickbait post without necessarily hurting a publisher’s other content.

In an update from August, Facebook started punishing publisher Pages that routinely used clickbait headlines. Now it says it can detect clickbait on an individual story level, meaning it will suppress a specific article from gaining traction in News Feed, but won’t necessarily punish the publisher’s other posts.

It’s also going to start categorizing clickbait headlines into two categories: Those that “withhold information” and those that “exaggerate information.” Neither offense is considered worse than the other, but headlines that fall into both categories will have an even tougher time gaining traction in News Feed.

Facebook’s official stance here is that clickbait headlines run counter to its efforts to create an “informed community,” which was a pillar of CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s big manifesto back in February.

But a simpler way to think of this is that Facebook is admitting that clickbait stories do more harm than good among users, even though some publishers obviously benefit from them. It’s the same reason Facebook is penalizing publishers that drive people to sites full of ads, or publishers that post false news.

Facebook is still reeling from the aftereffects of last fall’s presidential election, when false news reports ran rampant in News Feed thanks in part to coordinated efforts meant to hurt specific candidates. Cracking down on false news, but also extreme headlines that encourage partisan sharing without any substance to back them up, has been a major company focus ever since.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple reasons that we can't rely only on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on.

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. We can’t do that if we have a paywall.

That’s why we also turn to you, our readers, to help us keep Vox free. If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via