Major conservative activist groups are trashing House Republicans’ health care plan

Several high-profile conservative activist groups have already come out against the House GOP’s health care plan, arguing that it doesn’t go far enough to repeal Obamacare.

The groups — Heritage Action, FreedomWorks, the Club for Growth, Americans for Prosperity, and Freedom Partners — were influential players in several major legislative fights of the Obama era. Using their sway with House conservatives, they generally fight for lower spending, bigger tax cuts, and less government involvement with the private sector.

And all of them are now opposing the House GOP’s plan — a plan already viewed by many as too conservative to pass the Senate — for not being conservative enough.

FreedomWorks called it “Obamacare-lite,” Heritage Action said the bill accepts “the flawed premises of Obamacare,” the Club for Growth called it a “warmed-over substitute for government-run health care,” and the Koch brothers-affiliated Americans for Prosperity and Freedom Partners complained the bill “repeats the mistakes of Obamacare.”

It remains unclear how much sway these groups will have if President Donald Trump becomes deeply invested in lobbying members of Congress in conservative districts to pass this legislation. Arguably, Trump’s own rise shows that many Republican voters don’t care all that much about ideological purity on issues of spending and entitlements. So perhaps the president will have more sway than these groups on the thinking of conservative representatives who are most concerned with avoiding primary challenges.

Still, it’s surprising that Speaker Paul Ryan and other House leaders didn’t do a better job of getting conservative activist groups on board beforehand to avoid the current outcry. When you roll out a bill, you generally want it accompanied by a bunch of fulsome praise — and this is not that.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via