A Magic Leap investor says critics should stop ‘gloating’ and give augmented reality more time

Secretive augmented reality startup Magic Leap suffered another PR blow yesterday when Business Insider published a photo alleged to be a recent prototype of the company’s futuristic tech.

The picture, showing a large and janky computer hanging from a person’s back and wired to a pair of glasses, seemingly confirmed reports that Magic Leap — which has raised $1.4 billion to date — was struggling to shrink its product to a consumer-friendly size. In a post about “fake tech” last December, columnist Phil Baker likened Magic Leap to Theranos.

But hold your horses, one of the company’s investors says. Andreessen Horowitz partner Benedict Evans says the tech is real, just not ready to ship yet.

“There are a bunch of great people at great companies working on AR,” Evans tweeted. “No one is shipping a final product yet.”

That’s likely a reference to Magic Leap’s main competitor, the Microsoft HoloLens, which is shipping a compact set of glasses — but only to businesses and software developers, not to consumers yet.

Evans, who has received demos of Magic Leap’s work in progress, said that eventually, it will wow consumers the way early smartphones did:

He also dissed critics of the leaked picture, saying “gloating about any negative news (real or fake) about a startup is just as bad as uncritical praise. Maybe worse.”

Gloating aside: As an investor, Evans has an interest in encouraging more uncritical praise over criticism of real problems, since the latter might dent Magic Leap’s $4.5 billion valuation.

Another Andreessen partner, Kyle Russell, tweeted on Friday that the device that popularized multitouch, the iPhone, also went through an ungainly prototype phase:

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via