It’s official: Facebook wants to be your next TV

Facebook has long wanted to compete with TV for ad dollars — it boasted TV-sized audiences and liked to talk about people using Facebook alongside their favorite shows or the big game.

Now Facebook is saying, out loud, that it doesn’t just want to compete with TV. It wants to be your TV.

On the company’s Q4 earnings call Wednesday, CEO Mark Zuckerberg talked about his vision for Facebook video. Zuckerberg wants people to think of Facebook when they have the thought, “I want to watch video content now,” which sounds exactly like what you might use television or Netflix or HBO for today.

Here’s how Zuckerberg described his vision for Facebook’s video tab, a relatively new, video-only feed inside the core Facebook app:

“The goal that we have for the product experience is to make it so that when people want to watch videos or want to keep up to date with what’s going on with their favorite show, or what’s going on with a public figure that they want to follow, that they can come to Facebook and go to a place knowing that that’s going to show them all the content that they’re interested in. That’s a pretty different intent than why people come to Facebook today. ... The experience is designed to deliver on that promise — [that] you want to watch videos, you want to keep up with the content that you watch episodically week over week. This is going to be the place where you go to do that.”

Facebook has said publicly in the past that it plans to pay for high-quality video content. It’s currently in the market to license TV-style shows. Yesterday, the Wall Street Journal reported that it has a Facebook video app in the works for Apple TV and other TV boxes.

But Zuckerberg has never been quite this blunt about the company’s video ambitions. The idea of episodic content, stuff that gets people to come back week after week, seems like a key priority.

Zuckerberg said that Facebook needs to figure out a business model to entice video makers to create stuff for the social network, and specifically mentioned mid-roll ads, which the company is starting to test, as Facebook’s plan moving forward.

“That is going to enable the kind of content that’s going to take this to the next level,” he said. “A lot of the best episodic content is professionally created, and those folks need to make a good amount of money in order to support their business model.”

And even though Facebook has never admitted that it’s a traditional media company, paying creators for content sure makes Facebook sound like a traditional media company.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via