Now AT&T says it’s not sure when its Time Warner deal will close

AT&T, which first proposed buying Time Warner more than a year ago, says it is now “uncertain” when that deal will finally close, because it’s in talks with the U.S. Department of Justice.

That’s a change from just a few weeks ago, when Time Warner was telling investors the deal was on track to close by the end of the year. The deal was originally supposed to close last month, but the two companies said they would extend their original deadline “for a short period of time to facilitate obtaining final regulatory approval.”

Now John Stephens, AT&T’s chief financial officer, says he doesn’t have a timetable for the deal. That’s per analyst Walt Piecyk, who was listening to a Stephens interview at an investor conference this morning:

I’ve asked AT&T and Time Warner reps for comment.

If you’re AT&T and Time Warner and you want to get the deal done, you would likely argue that Stephens’ comments are no big deal: Giant $86 billion deals are complex, and it’s natural to be talking to the regulators that are supposed to sign off on the deal — and, most important, Makan Delrahim, the DOJ antitrust boss who’s the decision-maker on this deal, only started on the job a few weeks ago.

On the other hand: CFOs of giant companies generally don’t do a lot of ad-libbing in public forums. And Stephens’ comments come after the Wall Street Journal spooked investors by suggesting that the DOJ might sue to stop the deal.

And all of that is happening under a Donald Trump-shaped cloud: During his presidential campaign, Trump said he was against the deal. And he has been a vocal critic of Time Warner’s CNN unit, which leads to ongoing speculation that he might try to scuttle the deal for political/personal reasons.

Time Warner investors seem to be paying attention to Stephens’s comments: They’ve pushed shares down 2.5 percent in pre-market trading.

Update: There is indeed a there, there, Reuters reports. It says the DOJ is pushing for “structural remedies” in order to get the deal done, suggesting AT&T would have to sell something off to get the deal done.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via