Samsung’s Galaxy Note 7 recall could hardly come at a worse time

There’s no good time for a massive product defect, but the timing of the Galaxy Note 7 recall is especially unfortunate.

First, Samsung had been on something of a roll this year, having seen strong sales of the Galaxy S7 introduced earlier this year as well as supremely positive reviews for the Note 7.

Second, Apple is introducing new iPhones next week. Samsung had moved up the Galaxy Note launch from prior years in an effort to build momentum ahead of its chief rival.

It’s too soon to say how much the recall will cost Samsung, but it is likely to be a hefty sum. First, it must replace the million or so phones already sold. Plus, it is likely to have to absorb some of the costs that retailers and carriers face in making things right for customers.

But the biggest cost could be the lost momentum in the highly hit-driven smartphone business. It will be worth paying close attention to how well the Note 7 does when it goes back on sale.

Samsung is still in the early stages of executing the recall, with the phone maker and cellular providers scrambling to deal with the logistics of halting sales of a major device as well as replacing that many phones.

It says it has identified the battery flaw responsible for the issue, which it says is linked to 35 reported issues, including phones exploding or catching on fire.

Samsung had been counting on the Note 7 to keep things rolling in its high-end phone business, which is the most profitable part of the mobile business.

“Looking into the third quarter, the release of a new large-screen flagship smartphone will help to maintain solid sales of high-end smartphones,” Samsung said in its July earnings report.

The Note series is one of two key products for Samsung’s phone business, along with the Galaxy S line.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via