Donald Trump: Maybe "Second Amendment people" have a way to stop Hillary Clinton's judges

Speaking at a rally in Wilmington, North Carolina, on Tuesday, Donald Trump made an offhand comment that "Second Amendment people" might have some unspecified way to stop a President Hillary Clinton’s judges from abolishing gun rights.

"Hillary wants to abolish, essentially abolish the Second Amendment," Trump said. "By the way, and if she gets to pick — if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know."

Trump’s remarks are a bit garbled, but they appear to be a joke that gun owners could use their weaponry to prevent the government from rolling back their gun rights. Here’s the full context of his statement, via Politico:

Commentators soon debated what, exactly, Trump may have meant.

Did Donald Trump really just semi-incite someone to shoot Hillary Clinton or any federal judge that she appoints? https://t.co/ykUvZ6cd7s

— Paige Williams (@williams_paige) August 9, 2016

I think he meant you could shoot the judges.

— Ross Douthat (@DouthatNYT) August 9, 2016

From context, it's also possible that Trump was floating idea of armed rebellion against bad SCOTUS decisions, not assassination.

— Philip Klein (@philipaklein) August 9, 2016

Trump will say he wants 2nd amendment advocates to convince Senate to block Clinton pick. Keep in mind his advisor called for her to be shot

— Sam Stein (@samsteinhp) August 9, 2016

Eventually, the Trump campaign released a statement claiming he was just referring to "the power of unification" to stop Clinton's election, which really doesn't seem to be the case based on the original context — as Sam Stein points out, he was talking about judges she'd appoint after she already won.

Hillary Clinton's campaign manager had his own interpretation.

Just another day of the 2016 campaign.

Watch: This election is about normal vs. abnormal

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

We'll be honest: advertising alone isn't enough for Vox, or most newsrooms, to do the amount of high-quality journalism that the world needs and keep it free. We count on contributor support in order to produce nuanced, clear, and optimistic journalism. We don't have a paywall or ask our readers to subscribe in order to see our content, so instead, we’re coming to you this #GivingTuesday to ask you to make an investment in our future. If you’ve read an explainer this year that helped you to see an issue more clearly, got the answer to a long-time question, or just plain learned something, then we hope you’ll consider making a contribution of $20 or whatever you can today.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via