Twitter is finally paying its best users to create videos

Twitter wants the kind of video creators YouTube has — and the massive audiences that come with them.

To make this dream a reality, the company is pulling a page from YouTube’s playbook: It’s going to sell ads alongside creator videos and share that ad revenue with the people making the content. And Twitter is offering very appealing terms.

Unlike YouTube, which gives 55 percent of the money to creators and keeps 45 percent, Twitter is using the same revenue split it already offers other Amplify video partners, like the NFL: 70 percent to the content creator and 30 percent back to Twitter, according to a person familiar with the arrangement.

Of course, Twitter needs to offer an appealing revenue split like this. It’s nowhere close to the video destination YouTube and even Facebook have become, and it’s late to the game when it comes to paying creators. The network’s high-profile stars have wanted a revenue split for some time — it’s been a point of contention for the company’s stable of “Vine stars,” many of whom have left for places like YouTube where their videos actually make money.

So even with an appealing offer, it's unclear whether Twitter will be able to entice creators and viewers who already think of other video platforms first, or if the move is too little too late.

A few more details about Twitter's update:

• Twitter already offers this same revenue split to some premium content creators, like the NFL. But this move is for YouTube-style stars, and also automates the process — approved creators simply click a rev-share button when they upload their video.
• The revenue split only applies to video on Twitter, not its other video properties, Vine and Periscope. At least not broadly. (Vine started experimenting with a similar program back in June). Expanding it to those other platforms is a logical next step.
• Twitter is not requiring content exclusives as part of the deal. That means creators can post the same video to Twitter that they also post elsewhere.
• Twitter will not provide any advance funding to creators as incentive for trying the program. This isn't a shock. While Facebook has been paying all kinds of users to use its livestreaming feature, Twitter has refused to pay people (at least publicly) to use its own broadcast tool, Periscope.
• Anyone can apply for the program beginning Tuesday, though it's only open to U.S. users.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple reasons that we can't rely only on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on.

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. We can’t do that if we have a paywall.

That’s why we also turn to you, our readers, to help us keep Vox free. If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via