Skip to main content

Democracy needs journalism. Journalism needs you.

Fearless journalism is more important than ever. When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join today

Hillary Clinton said “systemic racism” in tonight’s speech. That’s major.

The way we talk about racism in America is changing.

Democratic National Convention: Day Four
Democratic National Convention: Day Four
Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images

Hillary Clinton’s acceptance speech on Thursday night at the Democratic National Convention marked two watershed moments. Of course she became the first woman to formally accept the presidential nomination of a major party.

But she also became the first presidential candidate of the two major parties to use the term “systemic racism” in her nomination speech:

I refuse to believe we can’t find common ground here. We have to heal the divides in our country. Not just on guns. But on race. Immigration. And more.

That starts with listening to each other. Hearing each other. Trying, as best we can, to walk in each other’s shoes.

So let’s put ourselves in the shoes of young black and Latino men and women who face the effects of systemic racism, and are made to feel like their lives are disposable.

Even for Barack Obama, a black man qualified to seek the highest office in the country, the conflicts brought forward by systemic racism were unavoidable. But the way candidates talk about it has changed.

Though Obama (and other presidential candidates) has addressed racial divides in his speeches, the term “systemic racism,” embraced in particular by younger activists, was not present in his addresses. The phrase refers to the deep-seated racial inequalities that plague major institutions.

But systemic racism has taken center stage in ways unparalleled in previous elections. Racism has reared its head through Obama’s campaigns in 2008 and 2012 and during his administration — whether it was “birthers” demanding Obama provide his birth certificate, the GOP darkening his skin in campaign ads, or conservative pundits challenging Michelle Obama’s patriotism.

But at the end of Obama’s historic two terms in office, racism isn’t something either party can hide behind.

Donald Trump seized the Republican ticket taking the GOP’s standard dog-whistle politicking to its most extreme limits. By contrast, the Democratic Party distinguished itself as the party of identity politics, embracing racial justice while Trump campaigns for an America that denies it exists.

Indeed, Trump is trying to “make America great again” through divisiveness. But tonight, Clinton reminded us not only that America is great but that we are “stronger together” when we are honest about the things that tear us apart.

More in Politics

Trump’s “shock and awe” approach to executive orders, explainedTrump’s “shock and awe” approach to executive orders, explained
Trump 2.0, explained

How Trump could use executive orders to force his agenda on America.

By Nicole Narea
The best thing that Joe Biden didThe best thing that Joe Biden did
Future Perfect

The administration’s biggest achievement is something that almost no one has heard about.

By Dylan Matthews
The bright side of TikTok’s downfallThe bright side of TikTok’s downfall
Technology

The end of one wildly popular platform is a chance to overhaul the broken social media industry.

By Adam Clark Estes
Biden just announced there’s a new constitutional amendment. Huh?Biden just announced there’s a new constitutional amendment. Huh?
Politics

A victory for women’s rights — or an empty political stunt?

By Andrew Prokop
Biden made good use of the pardon power. It still needs reform.Biden made good use of the pardon power. It still needs reform.
Policy

Presidents routinely abuse the pardon, but Biden’s record-setting commutations underscore why reforms should be narrow.

By Abdallah Fayyad
The Supreme Court’s decision upholding the TikTok ban, explainedThe Supreme Court’s decision upholding the TikTok ban, explained
Supreme Court

Nothing in the Court’s TikTok opinion should surprise anyone who has followed the case.

By Ian Millhiser