Getty Images CEO says VR is the next frontier for stock images, too

Across the film and video game industries, there is a consensus that virtual reality and 360-degree imagery are the next frontier.

That's also the case when it comes to still photos, says Dawn Airey, CEO of Getty Images, which on Tuesday is announcing a new dedicated VR business unit to its stock photography business.

"A great panoramic delivers a unique sense of presence," Airey said in an email interview. "It has a powerful way of making the viewer feel connected to the action in a way that is entirely different to a traditional image."

Getty has been experimenting with 360-degree image capture since the 2012 London Olympics, but plans to really dive in at this summer's games in Rio. There, Getty is the official photo agency, and it plans to equip each one of its photographers with a 360-degree camera in addition to their standard gear.

Robert Cianflone/Getty Images.

The agency has already partnered with Oculus to offer content for its devices and is also working with Google to provide 360-degree content for its Expeditions classroom effort, which allows students to travel virtually to places around the globe.

Of course, things are still early. Not many people have plunked down cash for a dedicated virtual reality device, but with Samsung's Gear VR and Google Cardboard out there, Airey said the time is right to get started.

"While the technology is still in its infancy, along with the business models that utilize it, we expect to see VR become a key tool for visual storytelling this year," she said.

Some things are actually better left to a traditional frame. "Not everything is engaging in 360 degrees," she said. It's also tricky on the technical side, with a photographer needing to find ways to expose for an image that has both sun and shadows.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via