Facebook’s newest live video hit: Livestreams of the Congressional sit-in

The first person to stream the Congressional gun control sit-in used Periscope, Twitter’s livestreaming app.

But Facebook wants you to know that its Live Video service played a part in the sit-in, which ended today after a 26-hour stretch, as well.

Facebook reps say that as of 10 am ET, 3 million streams of the sit-ins, filmed by members of Congress and their aides, have been watched three million times. Yesterday, Twitter said Periscope generated one million streams of the sit-in; I’ve asked Twitter for updated statistics.

Normally, the sit-in would have been covered by C-SPAN, but when House Republicans adjourned the session once the sit-in got going, C-SPAN’s cameras went dark; C-SPAN eventually rebroadcast hand-held feeds from Congress, using both Periscope and Facebook.

Update: Mark Zuckerberg now has a list of 19 reps who streamed using his product.

Facebook is very, very interested in pushing live video — so much that it’s paying both celebrities and web publishers, including Vox Media (which owns Recode), to produce content for the new service. And so far most of the discussion about live video’s possibilities centers around entertainment, for obvious reasons.

But I’m skeptical that most people want to watch their entertainment when it’s live, except in very rare instances — like the Super Bowl, or the Oscars, or when someone jumps out of a spaceship. ("Who is Felix Baumgartner, Alex.")

The whole point of the internet, says me, is to consume what you want, when you want to consume it — not when a network or advertiser or giant digital company wants you to consume it.

Still! It’s very nice to have the option to stream something live, or watch it live. And it’s particularly nice when it’s about government and the people who run it. And those people need more cameras on them, not fewer — "the public's work should be done in public," as my as my corporate cousin Casey Newton wrote today.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via