This congresswoman wants the rich to take drug tests to get their tax breaks

For welfare recipients, passing a drug test has become standard operating procedure in more than 15 states. Rep. Gwen Moore (D-WI) asks, why not also make this a requirement for the wealthy?

On Thursday, Moore introduced the "Top 1% Accountability Act," which would call for taxpayers with a federal income of over $1 million to be subject to a drug test when filing taxes, or else be forced to take a lower deduction. Though the bill will go likely nowhere in a Republican-controlled Congress, it does afford Moore the opportunity to make a point about drug testing for welfare recipients.

According to the Congressional Budget Office, the second-largest itemized deduction in taxes is mortgage interest, after state and local taxes. Of that expenditure, 73 percent goes to the wealthiest 20 percent of taxpayers, meaning the richest people receive the biggest tax breaks.

The way Moore sees it, these deductions are given back to the wealthy the same way welfare is given to the poor. Therefore they should be subject to the same trials and tribulations.

In an interview with the Guardian, Moore said she was inspired to write the bill after hearing a recent anti-poverty speech by Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R-WI), which he gave in front of a drug treatment center in Anacostia, a predominantly black neighborhood of Washington, DC.

"When he stood in front of a drug treatment center and rolled out his anti-poverty initiative, pushing this narrative that poor people are drug addicts, that was the last straw," Moore said.

According to a Think Progress analysis, over $1 million was spent on drug testing through 2014, even though the rate of drug use among welfare recipients is lower than the national average of 9.4 percent. In the states where drug testing is required, all but one have a rate below 1 percent.

"We're not going to get rid of the federal deficit by cutting poor people off SNAP [Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program]," Moore said. "But if we are going to drug test people to reduce the deficit, let's start on the other end of the income spectrum."

How wealth inequality is dangerous for America

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via